Building cleaning services, interior · California

Spencer Building Maintenance

Sacramento, CA · ~347 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Spencer Building Maintenance runs at 161% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Building cleaning services, interior workplace, earning a grade D.

Spencer Building Maintenance: 7.3 TCR = 161% of Building cleaning services, interior BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Spencer Building Maintenance safety composite

Spencer Building Maintenance scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2018→2023

Spencer Building Maintenance injury rate improved

Spencer Building Maintenance's TCR fell 1.3 from 6.5 in 2018 to 5.2 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 11.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.72× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=6.5 · 2019=9.3 · 2020=6.6 · 2021=4.2 · 2022=11.7 · 2023=5.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Sacramento, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 7.3 · 161% of ind

  • DART 5.2 DART
  • RANK #242/368
  • PHOTO Alaska Native Medica…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 86 inj
  • SIZE ~347 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Alaska Native Medical Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Spencer Building Maintenance in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Spencer Building Maintenance averages 7.3 TCR (161% of the Building cleaning services, interior BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Spencer Building Maintenance TCR series: 2018=6.5 · 2019=9.3 · 2020=6.6 · 2021=4.2 · 2022=11.7 · 2023=5.2 · BLS 4.5

Where Spencer Building Maintenance falls in its industry

4,064 Building cleaning services, in establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #242 safest of 368 Building cleaning services, in employers in California.

Spencer Building Maintenance (347 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Spencer Building Maintenance
Spencer Building Maintenance (347 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Spencer Building Maintenance has more employees than the Building cleaning services, interior median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 5.2 5.2 14 0 0
2022 11.7 7.5 22 6 0
2021 4.2 4.2 8 1 0
2020 6.6 4.9 9 6 0
2019 9.3 3.4 21 1 0
2018 6.5 2.8 12 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · CA · Sacramento

4,064 Building cleaning services, interior employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,348 employers in Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Alaska Native Medical Center 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR PSSI - 0777 Keystone Foods - Eufaula 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT SHARP CORONADO HOSPITAL - HSKP 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR The DM Burr Group - Kearsley Schools 7.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE West Valley 347 FTE
STATE-SIZE Advanced Construction Southwest of California, Inc. 347 FTE
STATE-SIZE 11DG081 MED-SURG CHINO 347 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2031 - Sacramento 347 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis Health 10,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Employment Development Department 8,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 451 5,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 485 5,500 FTE
NAT-TCR Joe's Garage Coffee, LLC 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Baucom's Nursery Company 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Eagle Rock Distributing Co. - Calhoun 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 0265 - Monroe Township Nj (Wet) Depot 7.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE 0171 - Sumner Wa (Dry) Depot 347 FTE
NAT-SIZE SDF4/6 347 FTE
NAT-SIZE Titan Tire 347 FTE
NAT-SIZE Demopolis Corndog Plant 347 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.