Belts, money, any material, cut and sewn from purchased fabric (except apparel contractors) · North Carolina

Spiritus Systems Company, Inc.

Aberdeen, NC · ~57 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Spiritus Systems Company, Inc. runs at 72% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Belts, money, any material, cut and sewn from purchased fabric (except apparel contractors) workplace, earning a grade B.

Spiritus Systems Company, Inc.: 2.4 TCR = 72% of Belts, money, any material, cut and sewn from purchased fabric (except apparel contractors) BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Spiritus Systems Company, Inc. safety composite

Spiritus Systems Company, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Spiritus Systems Company, Inc.: 0.0 → 2.3 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 6.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Spiritus Systems Company, Inc.'s TCR rose 2.3 from 0.0 in 2018 to 2.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 6.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 315990 · Aberdeen, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 72% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P47
  • PHOTO Volcom LLC
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Volcom LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Spiritus Systems Company, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Spiritus Systems Company, Inc. averages 2.4 TCR (72% of the Belts, money, any material, cut and sewn from purchased fabric (except apparel contractors) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Spiritus Systems Company, Inc. TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.3 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=6.8 · 2024=2.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Spiritus Systems Company, Inc. falls in its industry

62 Belts, money, any material, cu establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Spiritus Systems Company, Inc. (57 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 111 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Spiritus Systems Company, Inc.
Spiritus Systems Company, Inc. (57 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 111 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Spiritus Systems Company, Inc. has fewer employees than the Belts, money, any material, cut and sewn median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.3 0.0 2 0 0
2023 6.8 1.4 4 1 0
2022 2.8 0.0 2 0 0
2020 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

315990 · NC · Aberdeen

62 Belts, money, any material, cut and sewn from purchased fabric (except apparel contractors) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 40 employers in Aberdeen, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Volcom LLC 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stahls Special Projects 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR A&K Designs Inc 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stahls SCS 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Corporate Division 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kirlin Builders 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cape Romain / McLean A Joint Venture 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Engineered Steel Products 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1097 372 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1097 358 FTE
CITY-NEAR Burford's Trees LLC Region 342 286 FTE
CITY-NEAR Burford's Tree LLC - 342 220 FTE
NAT-TCR Avivo - 9 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Massey Services #23 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Southeast Construction Products Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR MBM-9 Central Valley CA 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Vision 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Andersen Distribution 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wifco Steel Products, Inc 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Juarez contracting 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.