Cushions, carpet and rug, urethane and other foam plastics (except polystrene), manufacturing · Illinois

Sponge Cushion

Morris, IL · ~67 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sponge Cushion runs at 118% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Cushions, carpet and rug, urethane and other foam plastics (except polystrene), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Sponge Cushion: 3.9 TCR = 118% of Cushions, carpet and rug, urethane and other foam plastics (except polystrene), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sponge Cushion safety composite

Sponge Cushion scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Sponge Cushion: 1.5 → 9.5 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 9.5 TCR · DART/TCR 2.04× in 2024

Sponge Cushion's TCR rose 8.1 from 1.5 in 2016 to 9.5 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2.04× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326150 · Morris, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.9 · 118% of ind

  • DART 7.9 DART
  • RANK #17/20
  • PHOTO Foam Products Corpor…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~67 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Foam Products Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Sponge Cushion in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sponge Cushion averages 3.9 TCR (118% of the Cushions, carpet and rug, urethane and other foam plastics (except polystrene), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sponge Cushion TCR series: 2016=1.5 · 2017=0 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=0 · 2020=7.5 · 2021=2 · 2022=5.9 · 2023=7.3 · 2024=9.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Sponge Cushion falls in its industry

474 Cushions, carpet and rug, uret establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 20 Cushions, carpet and rug, uret employers in Illinois.

Sponge Cushion (67 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sponge Cushion
Sponge Cushion (67 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Sponge Cushion has fewer employees than the Cushions, carpet and rug, urethane and o median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.5 7.9 6 0 0
2023 7.3 5.8 5 0 0
2022 5.9 3.9 3 0 0
2021 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2020 7.5 0.0 4 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 1.5 1.5 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326150 · IL · Morris

474 Cushions, carpet and rug, urethane and other foam plastics (except polystrene), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 62 employers in Morris, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Foam Products Corporation 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - Chattanooga 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pregis-Garland 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Creative Foam - PDC 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Decatur Cogeneration 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE SWECO - Chicago 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN ILLINOIS - Galesburg 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE 75G - Western S - IL Gas Ops 67 FTE
CITY-NEAR Morris Hospital 934 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dresden Nuclear Power Station 669 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1239 - MORRIS IL MEAT PLANT 458 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 844 388 FTE
NAT-TCR Heaton Erecting 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Innovative Composite Engineering 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Dimplex Thermal Solutions 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Hat Over the Wall Enterprises 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Easypak 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aag Asheville, LLC 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nexion Health 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kirby Risk Precision Machining 67 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.