Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction · California

Sposeto Engineering, Inc.

Livermore, CA · ~24 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sposeto Engineering, Inc. runs at 73% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction workplace, earning a grade B.

Sposeto Engineering, Inc.: 2.0 TCR = 73% of Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sposeto Engineering, Inc. safety composite

Sposeto Engineering, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.2

2018→2024

Sposeto Engineering, Inc. injury rate improved

Sposeto Engineering, Inc.'s TCR fell 8.2 from 8.2 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 8.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=8.2 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Livermore, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 73% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #369/551
  • PHOTO Occhino Corp
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Occhino Corp (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Sposeto Engineering, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sposeto Engineering, Inc. averages 2.0 TCR (73% of the Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sposeto Engineering, Inc. TCR series: 2018=8.2 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Sposeto Engineering, Inc. falls in its industry

4,078 Pavement, highway, road, stree establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #369 safest of 551 Pavement, highway, road, stree employers in California.

Sposeto Engineering, Inc. (24 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Sposeto Engineering, Inc.
Sposeto Engineering, Inc. (24 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Sposeto Engineering, Inc. has fewer employees than the Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 8.2 8.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · CA · Livermore

4,078 Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 296 employers in Livermore, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Occhino Corp 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Park Construction of NC 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR PW-Transportation Project Delivery 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brayman Construction & Trumbull, A Joint Venture 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Agro-Jal Farming Enterprises 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE MTD Farms 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Marc Pura Ranch, LLC 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Costa Farms 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR Retail Merchandising Solutions, LLC 4,717 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 577 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gillig LLC 940 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fat Chance Entertainment 917 FTE
NAT-TCR ECM Enterprises Inc. dba Ace Electric 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Deublin Company 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR DR Roof Inc 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Brask, Inc. - Neela 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rosati Specialties 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Coastal Inc. 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Agri Supply of Statesboro 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Agri Supply of Petersburg 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.