Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Virginia

Spring Arbor of Williamsburg

Williamsburg, VA · ~61 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Spring Arbor of Williamsburg runs at 336% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Spring Arbor of Williamsburg: 12.8 TCR = 336% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Spring Arbor of Williamsburg safety composite

Spring Arbor of Williamsburg scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
F 14.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Spring Arbor of Williamsburg: 15.7 → 16.2 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 16.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.14× in 2024

Spring Arbor of Williamsburg's TCR rose 0.5 from 15.7 in 2022 to 16.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.14× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Williamsburg, VA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.8 · 336% of ind

  • DART 14.6 DART
  • RANK #153/199
  • PHOTO 63164 SUNRISE OF STA…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 63164 SUNRISE OF STAMFORD (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Spring Arbor of Williamsburg in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Spring Arbor of Williamsburg averages 12.8 TCR (336% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Spring Arbor of Williamsburg TCR series: 2022=15.7 · 2023=6.4 · 2024=16.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Spring Arbor of Williamsburg falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #153 safest of 199 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Virginia.

Spring Arbor of Williamsburg (61 employees, TCR 12.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Spring Arbor of Williamsburg
Spring Arbor of Williamsburg (61 employees, TCR 12.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Spring Arbor of Williamsburg has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 16.2 14.6 10 0 0
2023 6.4 4.8 4 0 0
2022 15.7 11.0 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · VA · Williamsburg

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 183 employers in Williamsburg, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 63164 SUNRISE OF STAMFORD 12.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Weinberg Community for Senior Living 12.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2248-63129 12.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Guilford House 12.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE PGEC HQ 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE D.R. Horton, Inc. - Southern Virginia 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Polu Kai Services - Falls Curch 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Main Location 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR Busch Gardens (BGW) 1,383 FTE
CITY-NEAR Colonial Williamsburg Foundation 1,236 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6088 1,091 FTE
CITY-NEAR Busch Gardens Williamsburg 1,079 FTE
NAT-TCR Zingerman's Bakehouse, Inc. 12.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Marion 12.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Priority Ambulance - Operations 12.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Dundee Resort Development LLC DBA Arapahoe Basin Ski Area 12.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rnd Contractors, Inc. 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE GLST2 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plano Transportation - 3742 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clark Grave Vault Company 61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.