Retirement communities, continuing care · Illinois

spring Meadows Naperville

Naperville, IL · ~87 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

spring Meadows Naperville runs at 373% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Retirement communities, continuing care workplace, earning a grade F.

spring Meadows Naperville: 14.2 TCR = 373% of Retirement communities, continuing care BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

spring Meadows Naperville safety composite

spring Meadows Naperville scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−108.0

2016→2019

spring Meadows Naperville injury rate improved

spring Meadows Naperville's TCR fell 108.0 from 115.4 in 2016 to 7.4 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 115.4 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.52× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=115.4 · 2017=21.0 · 2018=74.8 · 2019=7.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Naperville, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.2 · 373% of ind

  • DART 7.4 DART
  • RANK #209/265
  • PHOTO HUDSON CREEK ALZHEIM…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~87 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HUDSON CREEK ALZHEIMER'S SPECIAL CARE CENTER (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

spring Meadows Naperville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows spring Meadows Naperville averages 14.2 TCR (373% of the Retirement communities, continuing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

spring Meadows Naperville TCR series: 2016=115.4 · 2017=21 · 2018=74.8 · 2019=7.4 · BLS 3.8

Where spring Meadows Naperville falls in its industry

4,127 Retirement communities, contin establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #209 safest of 265 Retirement communities, contin employers in Illinois.

spring Meadows Naperville (87 employees, TCR 14.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate spring Meadows Naperville
spring Meadows Naperville (87 employees, TCR 14.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

spring Meadows Naperville has more employees than the Retirement communities, continuing care median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 7.4 7.4 4 0 0
2018 74.8 74.8 6 0 0
2017 21.0 21.0 11 0 0
2016 115.4 38.5 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · IL · Naperville

4,127 Retirement communities, continuing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 241 employers in Naperville, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR HUDSON CREEK ALZHEIMER'S SPECIAL CARE CENTER 14.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Monmouth Crossing 14.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR BSL/BN Commons CCRC LLC 14.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Meadows 14.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE HI-Grade Egg Producers & Processors - Loda 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Acciona Energy USA Global 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN ILLINOIS - AIC Distribution Operations 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN ILLINOIS - Northern N - IL Gas Ops 87 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indian Prairie School District 3,568 FTE
CITY-NEAR Naperville Ill 1,349 FTE
CITY-NEAR Naperville Research Center 862 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2884 Cor3010 855 FTE
NAT-TCR Sinnott Blacktop, LLC 14.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 4769-6152-West Elm 14.2 TCR
NAT-TCR San Clemente Villas by the Sea 14.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Progreso LMMM Valley#6, LLC 14.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE D'Allessandro Corp. 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE American State Equipment Co. 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE LignoTech USA Inc. Rothschild 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE VRC Concord Village 87 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.