Commercial building construction general contractors · Texas

Spring Valley Construction Company

Dallas, TX · ~70 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Spring Valley Construction Company runs at 19% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Commercial building construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

Spring Valley Construction Company: 0.6 TCR = 19% of Commercial building construction general contractors BLS 2.9 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Spring Valley Construction Company safety composite

Spring Valley Construction Company scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Spring Valley Construction Company held a steady TCR band

Spring Valley Construction Company's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=1.4 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Dallas, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 19% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #65/327
  • PHOTO sbi Field Operations
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~70 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: sbi Field Operations (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Spring Valley Construction Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Spring Valley Construction Company averages 0.6 TCR (19% of the Commercial building construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Spring Valley Construction Company TCR series: 2016=0 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=1.4 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.9

Where Spring Valley Construction Company falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial building constructi establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #65 safest of 327 Commercial building constructi employers in Texas.

Spring Valley Construction Company (70 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Spring Valley Construction Company
Spring Valley Construction Company (70 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Spring Valley Construction Company has more employees than the Commercial building construction general median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2018 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · TX · Dallas

4,692 Commercial building construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,187 employers in Dallas, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR sbi Field Operations 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Path Construction Central, Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR MDS Builders, Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bright Arrow 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sales-OOS 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Legacy Farms 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE GP 176/GP 178 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE San Angelo 1214 Gas Plant Rd, San Angelo, TX 76904 70 FTE
CITY-NEAR AECOM DCS (US Operations) 15,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rexel USA, Inc 8,356 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1 CHILDRENS MEDICAL CENTER OF DALLAS 6,147 FTE
CITY-NEAR HDQ - Headquarters 5,764 FTE
NAT-TCR Avoca, LLC - NC 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR US MI Holland 11768 James St 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Pippin Wholesale Company 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. - Columbus 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Southwest Utility Systems Inc 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Watertown Piggly Wiggly 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amcon Laboratories, Inc. 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Production & Process Technologies, Inc. 70 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.