Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) · Texas

SpringHill Suites Houston DT

Houston, TX · ~31 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SpringHill Suites Houston DT runs at 62% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) workplace, earning a grade B.

SpringHill Suites Houston DT: 1.9 TCR = 62% of Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) BLS 3.0 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SpringHill Suites Houston DT safety composite

SpringHill Suites Houston DT scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.7

2016→2017

SpringHill Suites Houston DT injury rate improved

SpringHill Suites Houston DT's TCR fell 3.7 from 3.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.7 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.7 · 2017=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Houston, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 62% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #68/642
  • PHOTO Hampton Inn Mobile E…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hampton Inn Mobile East Bay Daphne (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

SpringHill Suites Houston DT in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SpringHill Suites Houston DT averages 1.9 TCR (62% of the Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

SpringHill Suites Houston DT TCR series: 2016=3.7 · 2017=0 · BLS 3.0

Where SpringHill Suites Houston DT falls in its industry

9,342 Hotel management services (i.e establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #68 safest of 642 Hotel management services (i.e employers in Texas.

SpringHill Suites Houston DT (31 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate SpringHill Suites Houston DT
SpringHill Suites Houston DT (31 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

SpringHill Suites Houston DT has fewer employees than the Hotel management services (i.e., providi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.7 3.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · TX · Houston

9,342 Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hampton Inn Mobile East Bay Daphne 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR TGC Hospitality Management, LLC/TownePlace Suites Macon Mercer 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fairfield Inn & Suites 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Drury Plaza Hotel - St. Paul Downtown 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE iFLY Dallas 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE TXD064 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE RM Rides, LLC 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aquamaid Pool Services 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Emco Wheaton Retail Corp. 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 0346 - Hialeah, Fl 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR HBSHSENC20 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Oldcastle OPI - Raleigh 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Martin Overhead Garage Door Service Inc. 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Superior Lawns Inc.-Plainfield Branch 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bieker Electric, Inc. 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0175 - Laurel, Md 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.