Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Colorado

Springs Ranch

Colorado Springs, CO · ~55 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
23.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Springs Ranch runs at 621% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Springs Ranch: 23.6 TCR = 621% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Springs Ranch safety composite

Springs Ranch scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 23.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−102.2

2020→2024

Springs Ranch injury rate improved

Springs Ranch's TCR fell 102.2 from 102.2 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 102.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=102.2 · 2022=100.3 · 2023=47.2 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Colorado Springs, CO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 23.6 · 621% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #74/75
  • PHOTO Bozeman Partners, LLC
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~55 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bozeman Partners, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Springs Ranch in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Springs Ranch averages 23.6 TCR (621% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Springs Ranch TCR series: 2020=102.2 · 2022=100.3 · 2023=47.2 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Springs Ranch falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #74 safest of 75 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Colorado.

Springs Ranch (55 employees, TCR 23.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Springs Ranch
Springs Ranch (55 employees, TCR 23.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Springs Ranch has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 47.2 40.7 3 19 0
2022 100.3 79.7 5 34 0
2020 102.2 102.2 3 23 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · CO · Colorado Springs

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 832 employers in Colorado Springs, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bozeman Partners, LLC 23.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Clearbrook Inn Living Center 23.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Evergreen Place Assisted Living- Champaign 23.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gurnee Bickford 23.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Morwai Dairy 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mountain Parks Electric, Inc Granby 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE San Miguel Power Association Inc. 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Landmark Construction Solutions Main Office 55 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Colorado Hospital Memorial Central 3,102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DEN4 2,948 FTE
CITY-NEAR Penrose Hospital 2,841 FTE
CITY-NEAR 05070001-050701 PENROSE HOSPITAL 2,391 FTE
NAT-TCR Virginia Repertory Theatre 23.6 TCR
NAT-TCR DCX2 Amazon Station 23.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 479510-Mem-East/Lamar Carr a 23.6 TCR
NAT-TCR MCO - Ground Ops 23.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Spring Creek Inn 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Three Mile Road Service Center 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Design Octaves 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE APB Construction Corp. 55 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.