Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, strip) made from purchased steel · Texas

SSAB Texas Inc.

Houston, TX · ~23 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SSAB Texas Inc. runs at 34% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, strip) made from purchased steel workplace, earning a grade A.

SSAB Texas Inc.: 1.1 TCR = 34% of Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, strip) made from purchased steel BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SSAB Texas Inc. safety composite

SSAB Texas Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

SSAB Texas Inc.: 0.0 → 3.2 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 3.7 TCR · DART/TCR 2.87× in 2024

SSAB Texas Inc.'s TCR rose 3.2 from 0.0 in 2016 to 3.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 2.87× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331221 · Houston, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 34% of ind

  • DART 3.2 DART
  • RANK #2/14
  • PHOTO Nucor Cold Finish
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Nucor Cold Finish (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

SSAB Texas Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SSAB Texas Inc. averages 1.1 TCR (34% of the Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, strip) made from purchased steel BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SSAB Texas Inc. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=3.7 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=3.2 · BLS 3.3

Where SSAB Texas Inc. falls in its industry

206 Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 14 Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g employers in Texas.

SSAB Texas Inc. (23 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate SSAB Texas Inc.
SSAB Texas Inc. (23 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 3.9

SSAB Texas Inc. has fewer employees than the Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g., bar, pl median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.2 3.2 1 0 0
2023 3.1 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.7 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331221 · TX · Houston

206 Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, strip) made from purchased steel employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Nucor Cold Finish 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cleveland Cliffs Zanesville Works 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grass America, Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR USS POSCO INDUSTRIES, INC 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Houston South Mill Distribution, LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Smallhold, Buda 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMARILLO SOD FARM 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE VISITORS MANAGEMENT 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Mader Southeast 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Silicones : Sistersville, West Virginia 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Franklin 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR AKBA 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Senior Living at Forest Ridge 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Detroit Location 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE LB Water- Frederick 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE K. Wohltman Construction, Inc. 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.