Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers · California

SSP Sacramento

Rancho Cordova, CA · ~33 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SSP Sacramento runs at 90% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade C.

SSP Sacramento: 2.0 TCR = 90% of Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SSP Sacramento safety composite

SSP Sacramento scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2017→2024

SSP Sacramento injury rate improved

SSP Sacramento's TCR fell 1.2 from 3.8 in 2017 to 2.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.8 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=3.0 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423930 · Rancho Cordova, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.0 · 90% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #24/91
  • PHOTO SA Recycling Decatur
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SA Recycling Decatur (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

SSP Sacramento in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SSP Sacramento averages 2.0 TCR (90% of the Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SSP Sacramento TCR series: 2017=3.8 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=3 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.6 · BLS 2.2

Where SSP Sacramento falls in its industry

1,126 Scrap materials (e.g., automot establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 91 Scrap materials (e.g., automot employers in California.

SSP Sacramento (33 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate SSP Sacramento
SSP Sacramento (33 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0

SSP Sacramento has fewer employees than the Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, indus median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.6 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.3 3.3 0 1 0
2019 3.0 0.0 1 0 0
2018 3.1 0.0 1 0 0
2017 3.8 3.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423930 · CA · Rancho Cordova

1,126 Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 163 employers in Rancho Cordova, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SA Recycling Decatur 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR SA Recycling, Beaver Falls 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR OmniSource LLC - P2NF 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR JI&M Auto Shred of Louisiana 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tutti Frutti Farms 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE EL CENTRO 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE BULLSEYE FARMS 18 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE River Vista Farms LLC 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 78 2,409 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 55 2,365 FTE
CITY-NEAR SK hynix NAND Product Solutions Corp., DBA Solidigm 1,407 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Technology 968 FTE
NAT-TCR CorrChoice - Cincinnati (Greif) 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Thomas Concrete of Georgia Doraville 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 2095 East 38th Street 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Ranger Construction-FTP 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Longley Brothers Dodge 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Salt Lake Swaner Rd 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carolina Multifamily Construction Inc 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kaplan Industries Inc 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.