Continuing care retirement communities · Missouri

St. Andrews Resources for Seniors System

St. Louis, MO · ~65 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

St. Andrews Resources for Seniors System runs at 34% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade A.

St. Andrews Resources for Seniors System: 1.3 TCR = 34% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

St. Andrews Resources for Seniors System safety composite

St. Andrews Resources for Seniors System scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

82/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2017→2019

St. Andrews Resources for Seniors System injury rate improved

St. Andrews Resources for Seniors System's TCR fell 2.5 from 2.5 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.5 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.5 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · St. Louis, MO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 34% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/85
  • PHOTO LEGACY VILLAGE OF ST…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~65 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LEGACY VILLAGE OF STILLWATER (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

St. Andrews Resources for Seniors System in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows St. Andrews Resources for Seniors System averages 1.3 TCR (34% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

St. Andrews Resources for Seniors System TCR series: 2017=2.5 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=0 · BLS 3.8

Where St. Andrews Resources for Seniors System falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 97% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 85 Continuing care retirement com employers in Missouri.

St. Andrews Resources for Seniors System (65 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate St. Andrews Resources for Seniors System
St. Andrews Resources for Seniors System (65 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

St. Andrews Resources for Seniors System has fewer employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2017 2.5 2.5 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · MO · St. Louis

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 686 employers in St. Louis, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LEGACY VILLAGE OF STILLWATER 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arden Courts of Whippany 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR PLUM CREEK PLACE 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR ISLF - Westchester-Sunrise, LLC 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE NW Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dodson Service Center 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central Plant 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE J. M. Fahey Construction Company 65 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monsanto - St. Louis 6,028 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Anthony's Medical Center 3,706 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABI Corporation 2,720 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Louis University Hospital 2,084 FTE
NAT-TCR Horwitz, Inc 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Tropicana - Sales 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR K-T Bolt 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Triangle Services - Fort Myers (RSW) Airport Janitorial 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mosaic Waco 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE HNL-HONOLULU 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE FedEx Supply Chain - Whrpl North Liberty 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Schertz TX Millwork 65 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.