Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Michigan

St. Ann's Home

Grand Rapids, MI · ~171 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

St. Ann's Home runs at 310% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

St. Ann's Home: 11.8 TCR = 310% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

St. Ann's Home safety composite

St. Ann's Home scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

St. Ann's Home: 0.3 → 7.9 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 24.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.67× in 2022

St. Ann's Home's TCR rose 7.7 from 0.3 in 2016 to 7.9 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 24.9 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Grand Rapids, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 11.8 · 310% of ind

  • DART 7.9 DART
  • RANK #64/97
  • PHOTO Progressive Care - M…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 65 inj
  • SIZE ~171 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Progressive Care - Majestic Pines (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

St. Ann's Home in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows St. Ann's Home averages 11.8 TCR (310% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

St. Ann's Home TCR series: 2016=0.3 · 2018=17.8 · 2019=10.3 · 2020=24.9 · 2021=9.6 · 2022=7.9 · BLS 3.8

Where St. Ann's Home falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #64 safest of 97 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Michigan.

St. Ann's Home (171 employees, TCR 11.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate St. Ann's Home
St. Ann's Home (171 employees, TCR 11.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

St. Ann's Home has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 7.9 7.9 8 0 0
2021 9.6 6.4 6 0 0
2020 24.9 20.7 4 14 0
2019 10.3 8.3 10 0 0
2018 17.8 4.0 18 0 0
2016 0.3 0.3 19 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · MI · Grand Rapids

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 1,006 employers in Grand Rapids, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Progressive Care - Majestic Pines 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Silver Springs 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR River View Assisted Living 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Inspired Living at Lakewood Ranch 11.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Manistee - Chemicals 171 FTE
STATE-SIZE Edwards Garment Co. 171 FTE
STATE-SIZE Grand Rapids Controls 171 FTE
STATE-SIZE JVIS USA LLC Benton Harbor Crystal 171 FTE
CITY-NEAR SHHG-GR BUTTERWORTH CA 9,012 FTE
CITY-NEAR SH Butterworth Hospital 7,397 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Saint Mary's Hospital-MH-MI 2,914 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steelcase - Grand Rapids / Kentwood 2,817 FTE
NAT-TCR Houston Airport Marriott 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Cocan - Canon City Center 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0019-0019-01642 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 178193-Sbn-Edison Park Sta 11.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Meadowood Retirement Community 171 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dyer Nursing & Rehab 171 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hospital District #6 of Harper County, Kansas 171 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lion Copolymer Geismar, LLC 171 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.