Mix Modal Transportation · Minnesota

St. Cloud Metropolitan Transit Commission

St. Cloud, MN · ~151 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.7
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

St. Cloud Metropolitan Transit Commission runs at 150% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Mix Modal Transportation workplace, earning a grade D.

St. Cloud Metropolitan Transit Commission: 6.7 TCR = 150% of Mix Modal Transportation BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

St. Cloud Metropolitan Transit Commission safety composite

St. Cloud Metropolitan Transit Commission scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

St. Cloud Metropolitan Transit Commission held a steady TCR band

St. Cloud Metropolitan Transit Commission's TCR held near 0.0 from 6.7 in 2017 to 6.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 11.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=6.7 · 2018=11.5 · 2019=8.2 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=9.0 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=7.0 · 2024=6.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 485111 · St. Cloud, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.7 · 150% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #12/18
  • PHOTO Frist Transit West 5…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 72 inj
  • SIZE ~151 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Frist Transit West 55506 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

St. Cloud Metropolitan Transit Commission in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows St. Cloud Metropolitan Transit Commission averages 6.7 TCR (150% of the Mix Modal Transportation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

St. Cloud Metropolitan Transit Commission TCR series: 2017=6.7 · 2018=11.5 · 2019=8.2 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=9 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=7 · 2024=6.7 · BLS 4.5

Where St. Cloud Metropolitan Transit Commission falls in its industry

421 Mix Modal Transportation establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 18 Mix Modal Transportation employers in Minnesota.

St. Cloud Metropolitan Transit Commission (151 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate St. Cloud Metropolitan Transit Commission
St. Cloud Metropolitan Transit Commission (151 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8

St. Cloud Metropolitan Transit Commission has fewer employees than the Mix Modal Transportation median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.7 3.0 9 0 0
2023 7.0 3.9 9 0 0
2022 2.4 1.6 3 0 0
2021 9.0 4.9 11 0 0
2020 2.5 0.0 0 3 0
2019 8.2 2.7 12 0 0
2018 11.5 3.2 18 0 0
2017 6.7 3.3 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

485111 · MN · St. Cloud

421 Mix Modal Transportation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 130 employers in St. Cloud, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Frist Transit West 55506 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Merlo 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1361 BUS OVERHAUL PROGRAM 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Four Mile Run Bus Facility 6.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Spectro Alloys Corporation 151 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dalsin Industries 151 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plato Woodwork Inc 151 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mendota Heights 151 FTE
CITY-NEAR CentraCare St. Cloud Hospital 4,767 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Cloud Hospital 4,414 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Cloud State University 1,454 FTE
CITY-NEAR CentraCare Health Plaza 928 FTE
NAT-TCR City Gym/Pool 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR New Image Pool Interiors, Inc. 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR S03011 - Grand Central Sanitation 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Dohmen Trucking dba F&M Transport 6.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE CMC Placing San Diego 151 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sacramento 212 151 FTE
NAT-SIZE PACE Akaloa 151 FTE
NAT-SIZE Norton Children's Medical Center NCMC 151 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.