Drug addiction rehabilitation facilities (except licensed hospitals), residential · Pennsylvania

St. Joseph Institute

Port Matilda, PA · ~55 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

St. Joseph Institute runs at 106% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Drug addiction rehabilitation facilities (except licensed hospitals), residential workplace, earning a grade C.

St. Joseph Institute: 4.0 TCR = 106% of Drug addiction rehabilitation facilities (except licensed hospitals), residential BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

St. Joseph Institute safety composite

St. Joseph Institute scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

St. Joseph Institute: 1.9 → 7.6 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 7.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.47× in 2024

St. Joseph Institute's TCR rose 5.7 from 1.9 in 2017 to 7.6 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623220 · Port Matilda, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.0 · 106% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #28/81
  • PHOTO Phoenix Houses of Lo…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~55 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Phoenix Houses of Los Angeles, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

St. Joseph Institute in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows St. Joseph Institute averages 4.0 TCR (106% of the Drug addiction rehabilitation facilities (except licensed hospitals), residential BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

St. Joseph Institute TCR series: 2017=1.9 · 2018=0 · 2019=6.7 · 2020=5.4 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=5.7 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=7.6 · BLS 3.8

Where St. Joseph Institute falls in its industry

1,165 Drug addiction rehabilitation establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #28 safest of 81 Drug addiction rehabilitation employers in Pennsylvania.

St. Joseph Institute (55 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate St. Joseph Institute
St. Joseph Institute (55 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.7

St. Joseph Institute has more employees than the Drug addiction rehabilitation facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.6 1.9 4 0 0
2023 2.3 0.0 1 0 0
2022 5.7 0.0 2 0 0
2021 2.7 0.0 0 1 0
2020 5.4 0.0 0 2 0
2019 6.7 2.2 3 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.9 1.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623220 · PA · Port Matilda

1,165 Drug addiction rehabilitation facilities (except licensed hospitals), residential employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Phoenix Houses of Los Angeles, Inc. 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR GREEN CASTLE RECOVERY CENTERS, LLC 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Coastal STARR Survival Shelter 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Silver Maple Recovery 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Olyphant, PA 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Viridity Energy Solutions Inc. 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stable Hollow Woodworking LLC 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Whistler Construction Company 55 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nittany Building Specialties 73 FTE
NAT-TCR S04520 - WM of Austin 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Phoenix Houses of Los Angeles, Inc. 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Tru - Las Vegas Airport 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Pelham AL Yard 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE S05452 - Bridgeport Hauling 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE S03021 - Newark Hauling 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE S04169 - Toledo Hauling 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE FXI, Inc. - High Point 55 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.