Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) · Missouri

St. Louis ARC

St. Louis, MO · ~36 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

St. Louis ARC runs at 48% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) workplace, earning a grade A.

St. Louis ARC: 1.8 TCR = 48% of Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

St. Louis ARC safety composite

St. Louis ARC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.2

2016→2020

St. Louis ARC injury rate improved

St. Louis ARC's TCR fell 9.2 from 9.2 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 9.2 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.2 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624310 · St. Louis, MO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.8 · 48% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #28/84
  • PHOTO Workforce Escarosa, …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Workforce Escarosa, Inc - 9th Avenue - Career Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

St. Louis ARC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows St. Louis ARC averages 1.8 TCR (48% of the Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

St. Louis ARC TCR series: 2016=9.2 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.8

Where St. Louis ARC falls in its industry

1,455 Vocational rehabilitation or h establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #28 safest of 84 Vocational rehabilitation or h employers in Missouri.

St. Louis ARC (36 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate St. Louis ARC
St. Louis ARC (36 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

St. Louis ARC has fewer employees than the Vocational rehabilitation or habilitatio median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 9.2 6.2 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624310 · MO · St. Louis

1,455 Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 686 employers in St. Louis, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Workforce Escarosa, Inc - 9th Avenue - Career Center 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Beachwood AAC 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Center of Workforce Innovations 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eastview 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hazelwood, MO 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2564-Marshall, MO 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Asbury Power Station 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Meter Services 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monsanto - St. Louis 6,028 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Anthony's Medical Center 3,706 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABI Corporation 2,720 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Louis University Hospital 2,084 FTE
NAT-TCR NEXT Electric LLC 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlas Peat & Soil, Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 0000000114 Quickchek Food Stores 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Ross store 331 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Grand Rapids ARC 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bridgeview IL Store 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lake Park Yard Operation 6201 Peterson Road, Lake Park, GA 31636 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE RC 20, Inc. dba # 1 Cochran Volkswagen of North Hills 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.