General medical and surgical hospitals · Pennsylvania

St. Luke's VNA Home Health and Hospice

Bethlehem, PA · ~344 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
8.7
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

St. Luke's VNA Home Health and Hospice runs at 116% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical General medical and surgical hospitals workplace, earning a grade C.

St. Luke's VNA Home Health and Hospice: 8.7 TCR = 116% of General medical and surgical hospitals BLS 7.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

St. Luke's VNA Home Health and Hospice safety composite

St. Luke's VNA Home Health and Hospice scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

St. Luke's VNA Home Health and Hospice: 4.3 → 14.0 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 14.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.17× in 2022

St. Luke's VNA Home Health and Hospice's TCR rose 9.7 from 4.3 in 2016 to 14.0 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 1.17× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · Bethlehem, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 8.7 · 116% of ind

  • DART 10.2 DART
  • RANK #233/262
  • PHOTO St. Joseph Medical C…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 98 inj
  • SIZE ~344 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: St. Joseph Medical Center Main Campus (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

St. Luke's VNA Home Health and Hospice in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows St. Luke's VNA Home Health and Hospice averages 8.7 TCR (116% of the General medical and surgical hospitals BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

St. Luke's VNA Home Health and Hospice TCR series: 2016=4.3 · 2017=5.2 · 2018=7 · 2019=4.3 · 2020=13 · 2021=13.1 · 2022=14 · BLS 7.5

Where St. Luke's VNA Home Health and Hospice falls in its industry

6,862 General medical and surgical h establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #233 safest of 262 General medical and surgical h employers in Pennsylvania.

St. Luke's VNA Home Health and Hospice (344 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate St. Luke's VNA Home Health and Hospice
St. Luke's VNA Home Health and Hospice (344 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

St. Luke's VNA Home Health and Hospice has fewer employees than the General medical and surgical hospitals median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 14.0 10.2 15 22 0
2021 13.1 11.1 17 23 0
2020 13.0 11.4 13 28 0
2019 4.3 2.3 12 1 0
2018 7.0 5.3 19 1 0
2017 5.2 4.7 12 0 0
2016 4.3 2.6 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · PA · Bethlehem

6,862 General medical and surgical hospitals employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 358 employers in Bethlehem, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR St. Joseph Medical Center Main Campus 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sutter Bay Hospitals (30020) 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Houston Methodist Sugar Land Hospital (Sugar Land, TX) 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gulf Coast Regional Medical Center 8.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE 2230 344 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2611 344 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2023 344 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5034 BREININGSVILLE RDC 344 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Luke's Hospital 5,338 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Luke's Physician's Group 3,041 FTE
CITY-NEAR LVH-Muhlenberg 2,139 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4087 2,105 FTE
NAT-TCR 4054-ABS-0020-0022-02798 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Arroyo Road 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-SWY-0029-0029-02832 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0020-0020-03621 8.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Von Maur Center 344 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2253-H4807 344 FTE
NAT-SIZE Zanesville Manufacturing Facility 344 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wolverine Worldwide - Distribution Center 48 344 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.