Construction machinery and equipment merchant wholesalers · Minnesota

St. Paul Regional Distribution Center

St. Paul, MN · ~17 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

St. Paul Regional Distribution Center runs at 73% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Construction machinery and equipment merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade B.

St. Paul Regional Distribution Center: 1.6 TCR = 73% of Construction machinery and equipment merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

St. Paul Regional Distribution Center safety composite

St. Paul Regional Distribution Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.2

2017→2023

St. Paul Regional Distribution Center injury rate improved

St. Paul Regional Distribution Center's TCR fell 11.2 from 11.2 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 11.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=11.2 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423810 · St. Paul, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.6 · 73% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/20
  • PHOTO Cowin Equipment Comp…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~17 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cowin Equipment Company of Montgomery (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

St. Paul Regional Distribution Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows St. Paul Regional Distribution Center averages 1.6 TCR (73% of the Construction machinery and equipment merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

St. Paul Regional Distribution Center TCR series: 2017=11.2 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.2

Where St. Paul Regional Distribution Center falls in its industry

533 Construction machinery and equ establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 20 Construction machinery and equ employers in Minnesota.

St. Paul Regional Distribution Center (17 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate St. Paul Regional Distribution Center
St. Paul Regional Distribution Center (17 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 3.0

St. Paul Regional Distribution Center has fewer employees than the Construction machinery and equipment mer median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 11.2 5.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423810 · MN · St. Paul

533 Construction machinery and equipment merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 370 employers in St. Paul, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cowin Equipment Company of Montgomery 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Empire Southwest, LLC - Kingman 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR RB Scott Company, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 04-TTCO-BIRMINGHAM PS 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Select Genetics MN Highway 12 003-0138-HT 17 FTE
STATE-SIZE Olivia - East 17 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hastings, MN 17 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cloquet 17 FTE
CITY-NEAR YCID 5,214 FTE
CITY-NEAR Boston Scientific CRM 5,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR United Hospital 3,384 FTE
CITY-NEAR IT Campus 2,409 FTE
NAT-TCR Dixon Bros Inc,. 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Spec Tool Company 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR AtlantiCare Health System, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR EXTECH/Exterior Technologies, Inc. 1.6 TCR

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.