Electric Power Distribution · Florida

St. Petersburg Complex

Saint Petersburg, FL · ~147 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

St. Petersburg Complex runs at 65% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Electric Power Distribution workplace, earning a grade B.

St. Petersburg Complex: 0.8 TCR = 65% of Electric Power Distribution BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

St. Petersburg Complex safety composite

St. Petersburg Complex scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

St. Petersburg Complex: 0.0 → 0.6 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 1.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.77× in 2024

St. Petersburg Complex's TCR rose 0.6 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 1.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.77× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Saint Petersburg, FL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 0.8 · 65% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #37/135
  • PHOTO Licking Rural Electr…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~147 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Licking Rural Electricfication (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

St. Petersburg Complex in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows St. Petersburg Complex averages 0.8 TCR (65% of the Electric Power Distribution BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

St. Petersburg Complex TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=1.3 · 2018=0 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=1.5 · 2022=0.7 · 2023=0.7 · 2024=0.6 · BLS 1.2

Where St. Petersburg Complex falls in its industry

2,958 Electric Power Distribution establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #37 safest of 135 Electric Power Distribution employers in Florida.

St. Petersburg Complex (147 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate St. Petersburg Complex
St. Petersburg Complex (147 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

St. Petersburg Complex has more employees than the Electric Power Distribution median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2023 0.7 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2020 1.5 1.5 2 0 0
2019 1.4 0.7 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.3 1.3 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · FL · Saint Petersburg

2,958 Electric Power Distribution employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 98 employers in Saint Petersburg, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Licking Rural Electricfication 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR SE REG-WACO 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR AMEREN MISSOURI - SEMO Division North 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookhaven Network 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE DiMare Ruskin, Inc. 147 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dundee Citrus Growers Association 147 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dallas 1 Corporation 147 FTE
STATE-SIZE Signature Systems Group, LLC - Orlando 147 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jabil Corporate and Regional Managing Offices 1,704 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jabil STP JDAS 665 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jabil-IT 510 FTE
CITY-NEAR West Pharmaceutical Services of Florida 410 FTE
NAT-TCR BrandSafway Industries LLC - IPL Power Plant - Petersburg 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Detroit 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR AMEREN MISSOURI - SEMO Division North 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Long Island 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Aaron Manor 147 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sagewood at Daybreak 147 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 053 147 FTE
NAT-SIZE Springdale Healthcare Center 147 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.