Boxed meat produced from purchased carcasses · Texas

Standard Meat Company-Saginaw

Saginaw, TX · ~319 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Standard Meat Company-Saginaw runs at 79% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Boxed meat produced from purchased carcasses workplace, earning a grade B.

Standard Meat Company-Saginaw: 2.6 TCR = 79% of Boxed meat produced from purchased carcasses BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Standard Meat Company-Saginaw safety composite

Standard Meat Company-Saginaw scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.7

2016→2024

Standard Meat Company-Saginaw injury rate improved

Standard Meat Company-Saginaw's TCR fell 8.7 from 9.8 in 2016 to 1.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 9.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.42× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.8 · 2018=2.0 · 2020=1.0 · 2021=0.7 · 2022=1.3 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311612 · Saginaw, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.6 · 79% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #10/51
  • PHOTO Grinds - Milwaukee WI
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 49 inj
  • SIZE ~319 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Grinds - Milwaukee WI (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Standard Meat Company-Saginaw in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Standard Meat Company-Saginaw averages 2.6 TCR (79% of the Boxed meat produced from purchased carcasses BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Standard Meat Company-Saginaw TCR series: 2016=9.8 · 2018=2 · 2020=1 · 2021=0.7 · 2022=1.3 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=1.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Standard Meat Company-Saginaw falls in its industry

613 Boxed meat produced from purch establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 51 Boxed meat produced from purch employers in Texas.

Standard Meat Company-Saginaw (319 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 202 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Standard Meat Company-Saginaw
Standard Meat Company-Saginaw (319 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 202 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Standard Meat Company-Saginaw has more employees than the Boxed meat produced from purchased carca median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.1 1.1 4 0 0
2023 2.4 1.7 9 1 0
2022 1.3 0.7 3 3 0
2021 0.7 0.7 3 0 0
2020 1.0 1.0 3 1 0
2018 2.0 1.0 6 0 0
2016 9.8 9.8 21 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311612 · TX · Saginaw

613 Boxed meat produced from purchased carcasses employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 36 employers in Saginaw, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Grinds - Milwaukee WI 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ohio Proteins 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kraft Heinz Oscar Mayer 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kansas City Sausage Company 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE 5430 LBJ FRWY LCIII DALLAS TX INCL SHARED SVCS 319 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ranger Fire Inc 319 FTE
STATE-SIZE 41215 319 FTE
STATE-SIZE LBW TURNER LLP 319 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 5316 439 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5316 414 FTE
CITY-NEAR CTI Foods, LLC. Soups 365 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ventura Foods Fort Worth 363 FTE
NAT-TCR Guidemark Inc 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Sanderson Farms Collins Hatchery 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR EMCOR Services Team Mechanical 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR CMH Home Medical Equipment 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE General Dynamics, Ordanance and Tactical Systems - Lincoln Operations 319 FTE
NAT-SIZE CNC Associates 319 FTE
NAT-SIZE Havco Wood Products, LLC 319 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heath Village 319 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.