Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) · Texas

StandardAero - Houston

Houston, TX · ~83 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

StandardAero - Houston runs at 44% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) workplace, earning a grade A.

StandardAero - Houston: 2.0 TCR = 44% of Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

StandardAero - Houston safety composite

StandardAero - Houston scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2022→2024

StandardAero - Houston injury rate improved

StandardAero - Houston's TCR fell 2.3 from 2.3 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=2.3 · 2023=3.6 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488190 · Houston, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 2.0 · 44% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #30/101
  • PHOTO ATL-ITP
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~83 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ATL-ITP (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

StandardAero - Houston in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows StandardAero - Houston averages 2.0 TCR (44% of the Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

StandardAero - Houston TCR series: 2022=2.3 · 2023=3.6 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where StandardAero - Houston falls in its industry

992 Aircraft maintenance and repai establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #30 safest of 101 Aircraft maintenance and repai employers in Texas.

StandardAero - Houston (83 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate StandardAero - Houston
StandardAero - Houston (83 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2

StandardAero - Houston has more employees than the Aircraft maintenance and repair services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.6 1.2 3 0 0
2022 2.3 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488190 · TX · Houston

992 Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ATL-ITP 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation Eglin Air Force Base (1515) 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation US NV Fallon Pasture Rd (1585) 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elliott Aviation DSM 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE BTA Oil Producers, LLC 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE ODESSA SVC CTR 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Durotech Inc. 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Specialty Restoration of Texas 83 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR KG Berry Farms LLC 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Diamondback Firearms 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Interstate Foam & Supply, Inc. Plant 1 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR D.R. Horton - Crown, LLC - Atlanta East - Augusta 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Old North State Masonry LLC 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3336 - Lawndale Hawthorne Blvd 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE APX York Sheet Metal, Inc. 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sloan Security Group, INC 83 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.