Transformers, electronic component-types, manufacturing · California

Stangenes Industries, Inc.

Palo Alto, CA · ~94 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Stangenes Industries, Inc. runs at 108% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Transformers, electronic component-types, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Stangenes Industries, Inc.: 3.6 TCR = 108% of Transformers, electronic component-types, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Stangenes Industries, Inc. safety composite

Stangenes Industries, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2017→2024

Stangenes Industries, Inc. injury rate improved

Stangenes Industries, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.4 from 5.8 in 2017 to 4.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 7.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.8 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=3.8 · 2022=7.1 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=4.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334416 · Palo Alto, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.6 · 108% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #15/17
  • PHOTO Coilcraft, Princeton
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~94 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Coilcraft, Princeton (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Stangenes Industries, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Stangenes Industries, Inc. averages 3.6 TCR (108% of the Transformers, electronic component-types, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Stangenes Industries, Inc. TCR series: 2017=5.8 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=3.8 · 2022=7.1 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=4.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Stangenes Industries, Inc. falls in its industry

134 Transformers, electronic compo establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 17 Transformers, electronic compo employers in California.

Stangenes Industries, Inc. (94 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 84 employees and a TCR of 2.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Stangenes Industries, Inc.
Stangenes Industries, Inc. (94 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 84 employees and a TCR of 2.1

Stangenes Industries, Inc. has more employees than the Transformers, electronic component-types median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.3 0.0 3 0 0
2023 2.2 2.2 2 0 0
2022 7.1 4.3 5 0 0
2021 3.8 1.3 3 0 0
2020 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2019 2.5 1.7 2 1 0
2018 1.8 1.8 2 0 0
2017 5.8 4.1 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334416 · CA · Palo Alto

134 Transformers, electronic component-types, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 116 employers in Palo Alto, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Coilcraft, Princeton 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR B&B Transformer, Inc. 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vishay Sprague Inc Tansitor 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Custom Electronics Inc 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE MORALES FARM LABOR SERVICE 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fondomonte CA - Blythe Farm 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE Robinson Enterprises, Inc 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE Javier Martinez Contracting 94 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stanford Health Care 16,371 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-CA-Palo Alto-Deer Creek-Office 1,878 FTE
CITY-NEAR Varian, Palo Alto 1,396 FTE
CITY-NEAR Palo Alto Medical Foundation (378-10110) 1,227 FTE
NAT-TCR Evergreen EWP 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Phillips Mushroom Farms INC 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 12 Kansas City, MO 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR STR0228 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Jeneil Biotech, Inc. 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE General ThermoDynamics 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE 721 Peoria 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE 141 Overland 94 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.