Architectural block, concrete (e.g., fluted, ground face, screen, slump, split), manufacturing · California

Stanton Plant

Stanton, CA · ~44 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Stanton Plant runs at 86% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Architectural block, concrete (e.g., fluted, ground face, screen, slump, split), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Stanton Plant: 2.8 TCR = 86% of Architectural block, concrete (e.g., fluted, ground face, screen, slump, split), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Stanton Plant safety composite

Stanton Plant scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.0

2017→2024

Stanton Plant injury rate improved

Stanton Plant's TCR fell 4.0 from 4.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 6.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.0 · 2018=3.9 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=6.4 · 2022=2.1 · 2023=4.2 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327331 · Stanton, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 86% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #9/33
  • PHOTO Kirchner Manufacturi…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kirchner Manufacturing Bridgeton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Stanton Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Stanton Plant averages 2.8 TCR (86% of the Architectural block, concrete (e.g., fluted, ground face, screen, slump, split), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Stanton Plant TCR series: 2017=4 · 2018=3.9 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=0 · 2021=6.4 · 2022=2.1 · 2023=4.2 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Stanton Plant falls in its industry

321 Architectural block, concrete establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 33 Architectural block, concrete employers in California.

Stanton Plant (44 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 4.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Stanton Plant
Stanton Plant (44 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 4.1

Stanton Plant has more employees than the Architectural block, concrete (e.g., flu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 4.2 4.2 2 0 0
2022 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2021 6.4 6.4 3 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2018 3.9 3.9 2 0 0
2017 4.0 4.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327331 · CA · Stanton

321 Architectural block, concrete (e.g., fluted, ground face, screen, slump, split), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 35 employers in Stanton, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Kirchner Manufacturing Bridgeton 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tremron - MIAP 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oldcastle Holbrook 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pavestone - SATP 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Firebaugh 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Boutonnet Farms 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central Coast Vineyards 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE FESTIVAL FARMS 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 394 846 FTE
CITY-NEAR CR&R Incorporated 580 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rowntree Gardens 317 FTE
CITY-NEAR Custom Pipe & Fabrication, Inc/ Stanton 128 FTE
NAT-TCR Kosiski Auto 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Agricultural Commodities Inc 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Highland - Wilmington 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Connecticut Water 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Winsupply Dayton RDC 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Evaporated Coatings Inc. 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lubing System, LP 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Metro Columbia Crew Quarters 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.