Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction · Florida

Starlink Construction Utilities

Odessa, FL · ~74 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Starlink Construction Utilities runs at 65% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction workplace, earning a grade B.

Starlink Construction Utilities: 1.8 TCR = 65% of Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Starlink Construction Utilities safety composite

Starlink Construction Utilities scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.9

2019→2020

Starlink Construction Utilities injury rate improved

Starlink Construction Utilities's TCR fell 0.9 from 2.3 in 2019 to 1.4 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 2.3 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.76× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=2.3 · 2020=1.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Odessa, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 65% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #53/98
  • PHOTO Henkels & McCoy, Inc…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~74 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Henkels & McCoy, Inc - Plymouth, MI (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Starlink Construction Utilities in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Starlink Construction Utilities averages 1.8 TCR (65% of the Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Starlink Construction Utilities TCR series: 2019=2.3 · 2020=1.4 · BLS 2.8

Where Starlink Construction Utilities falls in its industry

1,605 Alternative energy (e.g., geot establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #53 safest of 98 Alternative energy (e.g., geot employers in Florida.

Starlink Construction Utilities (74 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Starlink Construction Utilities
Starlink Construction Utilities (74 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Starlink Construction Utilities has more employees than the Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, oc median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2019 2.3 2.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · FL · Odessa

1,605 Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 37 employers in Odessa, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Henkels & McCoy, Inc - Plymouth, MI 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Minnkota Power - Milton Young 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mercury Communications Contractors, LLC 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Division #15 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Richard Hagstrom Ferneries 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Perrine Svc Cntr & Str 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Florida Distribution Control Center 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE PC1 Panama City Administration Line Service Center 74 FTE
CITY-NEAR FLODE - ODESSA 266 FTE
CITY-NEAR Store 1611 169 FTE
CITY-NEAR Store 1513 150 FTE
CITY-NEAR Polaris Sales Co Inc 141 FTE
NAT-TCR All Clear Plumbing 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Ross store 1736 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Ross store 1254 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Dynegy Miami Fort LLC 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sands Drywall Inc. 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hamilton Heights 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE SV Greenport LLC 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Catalina Offshore Products 74 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.