Social workers' , mental health, offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · New York

START Treatment & Recovery Centers

Brooklyn, NY · ~268 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

START Treatment & Recovery Centers runs at 27% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Social workers' , mental health, offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade A.

START Treatment & Recovery Centers: 1.0 TCR = 27% of Social workers' , mental health, offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

START Treatment & Recovery Centers safety composite

START Treatment & Recovery Centers scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2019→2020

START Treatment & Recovery Centers injury rate improved

START Treatment & Recovery Centers's TCR fell 2.0 from 2.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 2.0 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.02× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=2.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621330 · Brooklyn, NY AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 27% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/5
  • PHOTO Heartland
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~268 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Heartland (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

START Treatment & Recovery Centers in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows START Treatment & Recovery Centers averages 1.0 TCR (27% of the Social workers' , mental health, offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

START Treatment & Recovery Centers TCR series: 2019=2 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.8

Where START Treatment & Recovery Centers falls in its industry

137 Social workers' , mental healt establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 5 Social workers' , mental healt employers in New York.

START Treatment & Recovery Centers (268 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate START Treatment & Recovery Centers
START Treatment & Recovery Centers (268 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 4.8

START Treatment & Recovery Centers has more employees than the Social workers' , mental health, offices median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 3 0 0
2019 2.0 1.2 3 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621330 · NY · Brooklyn

137 Social workers' , mental health, offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 941 employers in Brooklyn, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Heartland 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Buckner CFS Dallas 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mi Escuelita 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eastway Behavioral Healthcare - Wayne Ave 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Delta Sheet Metal 268 FTE
STATE-SIZE Atlas Copco Comptec LLC 268 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trader Joe's 0542 New York 268 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1056 - Binghamton Vestal 268 FTE
CITY-NEAR EDI - Brooklyn 946 9,270 FTE
CITY-NEAR S & A Unified Home Care, Inc. 7,782 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maimonides Medical Center 6,641 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Langone Hospital - Brooklyn 5,690 FTE
NAT-TCR NFS:NFOG0 - NFOG0-Ogden, UT 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Cargill Agricultural Supply Chain - Sidney 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR PM Construction & Rehab LLC dba IPR - South Central 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR East York 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE QPS 268 FTE
NAT-SIZE L3 Unidyne Princess Anne 268 FTE
NAT-SIZE Voss Industries, LLC 268 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sofidel America 268 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.