Government base facilities operation support services · New Mexico

State of New Mexico - Facility Management Division

Santa Fe, NM · ~139 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

State of New Mexico - Facility Management Division runs at 143% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Government base facilities operation support services workplace, earning a grade D.

State of New Mexico - Facility Management Division: 3.7 TCR = 143% of Government base facilities operation support services BLS 2.6 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

State of New Mexico - Facility Management Division safety composite

State of New Mexico - Facility Management Division scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

State of New Mexico - Facility Management Division: 1.5 → 6.0 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 6.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.07× in 2020

State of New Mexico - Facility Management Division's TCR rose 4.5 from 1.5 in 2019 to 6.0 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 1.07× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561210 · Santa Fe, NM ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 3.7 · 143% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #6/11
  • PHOTO PT-PRESENCE ST. JOSE
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~139 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PT-PRESENCE ST. JOSE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Mexico employers → · Look up another →

State of New Mexico - Facility Management Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows State of New Mexico - Facility Management Division averages 3.7 TCR (143% of the Government base facilities operation support services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

State of New Mexico - Facility Management Division TCR series: 2019=1.5 · 2020=6 · BLS 2.6

Where State of New Mexico - Facility Management Division falls in its industry

757 Government base facilities ope establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Mexico alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 11 Government base facilities ope employers in New Mexico.

State of New Mexico - Facility Management Division (139 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate State of New Mexico - Facility Management Division
State of New Mexico - Facility Management Division (139 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.9

State of New Mexico - Facility Management Division has more employees than the Government base facilities operation sup median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 6.0 4.0 3 6 0
2019 1.5 1.5 0 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561210 · NM · Santa Fe

757 Government base facilities operation support services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,241 rated employers in New Mexico with headcount on file · 127 employers in Santa Fe, NM · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PT-PRESENCE ST. JOSE 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT HENRY MAYO NEWHALL POM 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ke`aki Technologies 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR GM Burton 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE San Juan Gathering and Measurement 139 FTE
STATE-SIZE San Juan Plants, Maintenance and Support 139 FTE
STATE-SIZE Salls 139 FTE
STATE-SIZE FNF Construction, Inc. - New Mexico 139 FTE
CITY-NEAR Meow Wolf, INC 371 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3423 277 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3423 269 FTE
CITY-NEAR USM Store #927 (MARKET STREET) 266 FTE
NAT-TCR McCarthy-Castle Joint Venture, Tomahawk Creek WWTF 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Grand Traverse Container 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Foremost Farms - Chilton 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR FBG Service Corporation Lincoln 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Haltom 139 FTE
NAT-SIZE Granite Health & Rehab 139 FTE
NAT-SIZE PowerBack Piscataway 139 FTE
NAT-SIZE D32 Washington DC 139 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.