Water treatment plant construction · North Carolina

State Utility Contractors, Inc. Monroe

Monroe, NC · ~181 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

State Utility Contractors, Inc. Monroe runs at 99% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Water treatment plant construction workplace, earning a grade C.

State Utility Contractors, Inc. Monroe: 2.8 TCR = 99% of Water treatment plant construction BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

State Utility Contractors, Inc. Monroe safety composite

State Utility Contractors, Inc. Monroe scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.8

2016→2020

State Utility Contractors, Inc. Monroe injury rate improved

State Utility Contractors, Inc. Monroe's TCR fell 2.8 from 4.7 in 2016 to 1.9 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.7 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.7 · 2017=3.1 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Monroe, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 99% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #21/55
  • PHOTO Juarez contracting
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~181 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Juarez contracting (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

State Utility Contractors, Inc. Monroe in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows State Utility Contractors, Inc. Monroe averages 2.8 TCR (99% of the Water treatment plant construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

State Utility Contractors, Inc. Monroe TCR series: 2016=4.7 · 2017=3.1 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=1.9 · BLS 2.8

Where State Utility Contractors, Inc. Monroe falls in its industry

1,614 Water treatment plant construc establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 55 Water treatment plant construc employers in North Carolina.

State Utility Contractors, Inc. Monroe (181 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate State Utility Contractors, Inc. Monroe
State Utility Contractors, Inc. Monroe (181 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

State Utility Contractors, Inc. Monroe has more employees than the Water treatment plant construction median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 1.9 1.9 4 0 0
2019 2.5 2.0 5 0 0
2018 1.7 1.7 3 0 0
2017 3.1 3.1 6 0 0
2016 4.7 2.6 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · NC · Monroe

1,614 Water treatment plant construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 163 employers in Monroe, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Juarez contracting 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Azar Services LLC 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR TALUS CONSTRUCTION, INC 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Glacier Construction Co., Inc 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Marshall Steam Station 181 FTE
STATE-SIZE Universal Forest Products - Salisbury, LLC. 181 FTE
STATE-SIZE Graphik Dimensions 181 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lyndon Steel, LLC 181 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monroe Plant 1,584 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0060-CHS Union 1,214 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0060-Atrium Health Union 1,147 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1108-Atrium Health Union (1108) 1,041 FTE
NAT-TCR Freeborn Mower Cooperative Services 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Edelstein Facility 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Royal Sonesta Chase Park Plaza 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR All Locations 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pan oston 181 FTE
NAT-SIZE Engledow Corporate 181 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Clift - Royal Sonesta 181 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rootstown GAMCO 181 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.