Traveler Accomdations · South Carolina

Staybridge Suites Greenville

Greenville, SC · ~22 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Staybridge Suites Greenville runs at 124% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Traveler Accomdations workplace, earning a grade D.

Staybridge Suites Greenville: 3.7 TCR = 124% of Traveler Accomdations BLS 3.0 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Staybridge Suites Greenville safety composite

Staybridge Suites Greenville scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.2

2016→2023

Staybridge Suites Greenville injury rate improved

Staybridge Suites Greenville's TCR fell 5.2 from 5.2 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 12.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.2 · 2017=4.9 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=7.4 · 2022=12.4 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Greenville, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.7 · 124% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #72/138
  • PHOTO 156-PHILADELPHIA MAR…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 156-PHILADELPHIA MARRIOTT WEST (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Staybridge Suites Greenville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Staybridge Suites Greenville averages 3.7 TCR (124% of the Traveler Accomdations BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Staybridge Suites Greenville TCR series: 2016=5.2 · 2017=4.9 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=7.4 · 2022=12.4 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.0

Where Staybridge Suites Greenville falls in its industry

9,342 Traveler Accomdations establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #72 safest of 138 Traveler Accomdations employers in South Carolina.

Staybridge Suites Greenville (22 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Staybridge Suites Greenville
Staybridge Suites Greenville (22 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Staybridge Suites Greenville has fewer employees than the Traveler Accomdations median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 12.4 6.2 2 0 0
2021 7.4 7.4 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 4.9 4.9 1 0 0
2016 5.2 5.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · SC · Greenville

9,342 Traveler Accomdations employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 573 employers in Greenville, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 156-PHILADELPHIA MARRIOTT WEST 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spring Hill Suites Country Club Plaza 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Catamaran Resort Hotel and Spa 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Doubletree Wilmington 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE ISE Newberry Liquid Plant 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Summerville SC 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allendale Biomass LLC 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greenville Business Office 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR GREENVILLE MEMORIAL MED CAMPUS 6,132 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Francis Health System 3,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gas Power Systems : Greenville, SC, USA 2,971 FTE
CITY-NEAR GSC : Greenville, SC, USA 2,673 FTE
NAT-TCR Atlanta Attachment Company 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Magotteaux 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR RICHMOND 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR PetroSpecs, Inc. 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rsl, LLC - Fw 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Innovative Home Health 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Austin Powder Central States LLC - Fredericktown 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heartland Custom Homes, Inc. 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.