Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities · Connecticut

StayingWELL by RVNA

Ridgefield, CT · ~214 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

StayingWELL by RVNA runs at 90% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities workplace, earning a grade C.

StayingWELL by RVNA: 3.4 TCR = 90% of Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

StayingWELL by RVNA safety composite

StayingWELL by RVNA scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

StayingWELL by RVNA: 2.1 → 4.7 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 4.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.37× in 2024

StayingWELL by RVNA's TCR rose 2.5 from 2.1 in 2023 to 4.7 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.37× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Ridgefield, CT AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.4 · 90% of ind

  • DART 4.7 DART
  • RANK #11/31
  • PHOTO Admin Building
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~214 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Admin Building (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

StayingWELL by RVNA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows StayingWELL by RVNA averages 3.4 TCR (90% of the Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

StayingWELL by RVNA TCR series: 2023=2.1 · 2024=4.7 · BLS 3.8

Where StayingWELL by RVNA falls in its industry

1,320 Companion services for disable establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 31 Companion services for disable employers in Connecticut.

StayingWELL by RVNA (214 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate StayingWELL by RVNA
StayingWELL by RVNA (214 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

StayingWELL by RVNA has more employees than the Companion services for disabled persons, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.7 4.7 6 0 0
2023 2.1 0.7 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · CT · Ridgefield

1,320 Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 36 employers in Ridgefield, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Admin Building 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Okmulgee Plus 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR PSC White Rock 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Avery Employee Leasing 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Specialty Printing, LLC 214 FTE
STATE-SIZE StoneRidge Senior Care, LLC 214 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lord Chamberlain 214 FTE
STATE-SIZE 226_346 214 FTE
CITY-NEAR BI Pharmaceuticals/BI USA 5,067 FTE
CITY-NEAR Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceutics Inc. 4,620 FTE
CITY-NEAR RVNA 256 FTE
CITY-NEAR RVNAhealth 254 FTE
NAT-TCR Macawber Engineering, Inc. 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Anthony Thomas Candy Co. 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Archbold 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR FV Clinics-Rice Street 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Warner Electric 214 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greenfield 214 FTE
NAT-SIZE Safran Aerospace Composites 214 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mtmis - Missoula 214 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.