Ferroalloys manufacturing · Indiana

Steel Dynamics Flat Roll Group - Iron Dynamics

Butler, IN · ~96 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Steel Dynamics Flat Roll Group - Iron Dynamics runs at 74% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Ferroalloys manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Steel Dynamics Flat Roll Group - Iron Dynamics: 2.5 TCR = 74% of Ferroalloys manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Steel Dynamics Flat Roll Group - Iron Dynamics safety composite

Steel Dynamics Flat Roll Group - Iron Dynamics scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.2

2016→2020

Steel Dynamics Flat Roll Group - Iron Dynamics injury rate improved

Steel Dynamics Flat Roll Group - Iron Dynamics's TCR fell 3.2 from 4.0 in 2016 to 0.9 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.4 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.0 · 2017=1.9 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=5.4 · 2020=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331110 · Butler, IN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 74% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #26/42
  • PHOTO Quality Industries o…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~96 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Quality Industries of America (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Steel Dynamics Flat Roll Group - Iron Dynamics in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Steel Dynamics Flat Roll Group - Iron Dynamics averages 2.5 TCR (74% of the Ferroalloys manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Steel Dynamics Flat Roll Group - Iron Dynamics TCR series: 2016=4 · 2017=1.9 · 2018=0 · 2019=5.4 · 2020=0.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Steel Dynamics Flat Roll Group - Iron Dynamics falls in its industry

416 Ferroalloys manufacturing establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #26 safest of 42 Ferroalloys manufacturing employers in Indiana.

Steel Dynamics Flat Roll Group - Iron Dynamics (96 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Steel Dynamics Flat Roll Group - Iron Dynamics
Steel Dynamics Flat Roll Group - Iron Dynamics (96 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Steel Dynamics Flat Roll Group - Iron Dynamics has fewer employees than the Ferroalloys manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.9 0.0 1 0 0
2019 5.4 2.7 5 1 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.9 0.0 2 0 0
2016 4.0 3.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331110 · IN · Butler

416 Ferroalloys manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 26 employers in Butler, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Quality Industries of America 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR W. Silver, Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Levy Environmental Services Company dba Levy Gallatin Mill Service 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Indiana Steel Fabricating, Inc. 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Indiana Municipal Power Agency 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE National Water Services 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE 104273 - Headwaters Wind Farm 200MW 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cobalt Civil, LLC 96 FTE
CITY-NEAR Therma Tru 947 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steel Dynamics, Inc. - Flat Roll Group - Butler 918 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steel Dynamics Flat Roll Group - Butler 780 FTE
CITY-NEAR Multimatic Indiana 338 FTE
NAT-TCR Southern Refrigerated Transport 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Neolpharma, Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Save A Lot #79 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR LCI Main Office Location 1 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE TranSource Greensboro 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Universal Forest Products plant 380 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kings Nursing & Rehabilitation Hospital, Inc. 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mauser USA Mt Vernon IBC 96 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.