Steel manufacturing · Texas

Steel Dynamics, Inc. - Flat Roll Group - Sinton

Sinton, TX · ~775 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Steel Dynamics, Inc. - Flat Roll Group - Sinton runs at 47% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Steel manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. - Flat Roll Group - Sinton: 1.6 TCR = 47% of Steel manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Steel Dynamics, Inc. - Flat Roll Group - Sinton safety composite

Steel Dynamics, Inc. - Flat Roll Group - Sinton scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2022→2024

Steel Dynamics, Inc. - Flat Roll Group - Sinton injury rate improved

Steel Dynamics, Inc. - Flat Roll Group - Sinton's TCR fell 0.6 from 1.8 in 2022 to 1.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 1.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.55× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=1.8 · 2023=1.5 · 2024=1.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331110 · Sinton, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 47% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #8/28
  • PHOTO Great Lakes Works
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 36 inj
  • SIZE ~775 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Great Lakes Works (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Steel Dynamics, Inc. - Flat Roll Group - Sinton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Steel Dynamics, Inc. - Flat Roll Group - Sinton averages 1.6 TCR (47% of the Steel manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Steel Dynamics, Inc. - Flat Roll Group - Sinton TCR series: 2022=1.8 · 2023=1.5 · 2024=1.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Steel Dynamics, Inc. - Flat Roll Group - Sinton falls in its industry

416 Steel manufacturing establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 28 Steel manufacturing employers in Texas.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. - Flat Roll Group - Sinton (775 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Steel Dynamics, Inc. - Flat Roll Group - Sinton
Steel Dynamics, Inc. - Flat Roll Group - Sinton (775 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Steel Dynamics, Inc. - Flat Roll Group - Sinton has more employees than the Steel manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.3 0.8 10 2 0
2023 1.5 0.7 13 0 0
2022 1.8 0.6 13 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331110 · TX · Sinton

416 Steel manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 18 employers in Sinton, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Great Lakes Works 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR PCP - Casa Grande 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR LMI Manufacturing Holdings, LLC 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR AK Steel - Mansfield Works 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE EDP Renewables North America LLC 776 FTE
STATE-SIZE DNT Construction LLC 776 FTE
STATE-SIZE Performance Contractors, Inc. - INEOS Chocolate Bayou 774 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alterman, Inc. 774 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steel Dynamics FR Sinton 288 FTE
CITY-NEAR Blanchette Field Services 186 FTE
CITY-NEAR Coonrod Electric Co. LLC 164 FTE
CITY-NEAR J. Carroll Weaver Inc. 77 FTE
NAT-TCR The AZEK Company - KEYSER AVE 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Monroe Kut Interiors LlC 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR WFS- Netl Albany 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Gentex Corporation 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Princeton 775 FTE
NAT-SIZE Homes for Independent Living 775 FTE
NAT-SIZE Denali Universal Services 775 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - AGS5 775 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.