Metals service centers · Indiana

Steel Technologies Crawfordsville

Crawfordsville, IN · ~98 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Steel Technologies Crawfordsville runs at 172% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Metals service centers workplace, earning a grade D.

Steel Technologies Crawfordsville: 3.8 TCR = 172% of Metals service centers BLS 2.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Steel Technologies Crawfordsville safety composite

Steel Technologies Crawfordsville scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.6

2016→2023

Steel Technologies Crawfordsville injury rate improved

Steel Technologies Crawfordsville's TCR fell 2.6 from 3.7 in 2016 to 1.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 7.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.7 · 2017=4.7 · 2018=3.6 · 2019=7.0 · 2020=6.9 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423510 · Crawfordsville, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.8 · 172% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #39/75
  • PHOTO Central Coil Process…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~98 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Central Coil Processing (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Steel Technologies Crawfordsville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Steel Technologies Crawfordsville averages 3.8 TCR (172% of the Metals service centers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Steel Technologies Crawfordsville TCR series: 2016=3.7 · 2017=4.7 · 2018=3.6 · 2019=7 · 2020=6.9 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=1.1 · BLS 2.2

Where Steel Technologies Crawfordsville falls in its industry

1,299 Metals service centers establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #39 safest of 75 Metals service centers employers in Indiana.

Steel Technologies Crawfordsville (98 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Steel Technologies Crawfordsville
Steel Technologies Crawfordsville (98 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Steel Technologies Crawfordsville has more employees than the Metals service centers median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.1 0.0 1 0 0
2022 3.3 1.1 3 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 6.9 3.4 6 0 0
2019 7.0 3.5 7 1 0
2018 3.6 1.4 5 0 0
2017 4.7 1.9 5 0 0
2016 3.7 2.5 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423510 · IN · Crawfordsville

1,299 Metals service centers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 66 employers in Crawfordsville, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Central Coil Processing 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Location #9 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR New Process Steel, L.P., Butler 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Earle M. Jorgensen Company Kansas City 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Logansport Utilites 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pemberton Davis Electric 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE American Beverage Marketers 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE House of Fara, Inc 98 FTE
CITY-NEAR LSC Communications 986 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lakeside Book Company - Crawfordsville 833 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nucor Steel 793 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nucor Steel-Indiana 765 FTE
NAT-TCR The Lowry 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR J. F. Fischer, Inc. 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Ideal Stair Parts 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Neshoba Feed Mill (MLO) 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Laham - Hammond Package Center 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Motion Systems : Wadsworth 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Katoen Natie Specialty Chemicals Inc. Pensacola 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Byron Park 98 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.