Real estate asset management services (except property management) · Indiana

Stenz Management Company

Indianapolis, IN · ~28 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Stenz Management Company runs at 220% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Real estate asset management services (except property management) workplace, earning a grade F.

Stenz Management Company: 3.1 TCR = 220% of Real estate asset management services (except property management) BLS 1.4 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Stenz Management Company safety composite

Stenz Management Company scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Stenz Management Company held a steady TCR band

Stenz Management Company's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 8.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.0 · 2020=8.6 · 2021=3.7 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 531390 · Indianapolis, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 3.1 · 220% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/5
  • PHOTO Resort Vacations 7
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Resort Vacations 7 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Stenz Management Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Stenz Management Company averages 3.1 TCR (220% of the Real estate asset management services (except property management) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Stenz Management Company TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=8.6 · 2021=3.7 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.4

Where Stenz Management Company falls in its industry

90 Real estate asset management s establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 5 Real estate asset management s employers in Indiana.

Stenz Management Company (28 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 73 employees and a TCR of 2.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Stenz Management Company
Stenz Management Company (28 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 73 employees and a TCR of 2.1

Stenz Management Company has fewer employees than the Real estate asset management services (e median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2021 3.7 3.7 1 0 0
2020 8.6 4.3 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

531390 · IN · Indianapolis

90 Real estate asset management services (except property management) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 2,074 employers in Indianapolis, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Resort Vacations 7 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Resort Vacations 2 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Turner Properties Inc - 1050 Techwood Drive NW 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ogden & Company, Inc. 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eagle Valley CCGT 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shelbyville District Office 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Decatur County REMC 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - Columbus 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana University Health, Inc 7,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eli Lilly - Lilly Corp Center 6,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lilly Technology Center 6,472 FTE
NAT-TCR Tubular Steel Rialto 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Future Foam, Inc- Plant 03 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Future Foam, Inc.- Plant 15 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR S10035 - Hohn Road Landfill 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE North Dartmouth 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Primo Construction LLC 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE College Point 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tarboro 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.