Footing and foundation concrete contractors · Nebraska

Stephens & Smith Consruction Co., Inc

Omaha, NE · ~64 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Stephens & Smith Consruction Co., Inc runs at 193% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Footing and foundation concrete contractors workplace, earning a grade D.

Stephens & Smith Consruction Co., Inc: 5.4 TCR = 193% of Footing and foundation concrete contractors BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Stephens & Smith Consruction Co., Inc safety composite

Stephens & Smith Consruction Co., Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Stephens & Smith Consruction Co., Inc: 4.5 → 8.3 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 8.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.54× in 2024

Stephens & Smith Consruction Co., Inc's TCR rose 3.8 from 4.5 in 2018 to 8.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 8.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.54× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238110 · Omaha, NE ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.4 · 193% of ind

  • DART 8.3 DART
  • RANK #11/15
  • PHOTO SAK Builders
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~64 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SAK Builders (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nebraska employers → · Look up another →

Stephens & Smith Consruction Co., Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Stephens & Smith Consruction Co., Inc averages 5.4 TCR (193% of the Footing and foundation concrete contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Stephens & Smith Consruction Co., Inc TCR series: 2018=4.5 · 2019=8.7 · 2020=6.8 · 2021=5.3 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=2.8 · 2024=8.3 · BLS 2.8

Where Stephens & Smith Consruction Co., Inc falls in its industry

1,314 Footing and foundation concret establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nebraska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 15 Footing and foundation concret employers in Nebraska.

Stephens & Smith Consruction Co., Inc (64 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Stephens & Smith Consruction Co., Inc
Stephens & Smith Consruction Co., Inc (64 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Stephens & Smith Consruction Co., Inc has more employees than the Footing and foundation concrete contract median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.3 8.3 5 0 0
2023 2.8 1.4 2 0 0
2022 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2021 5.3 2.6 4 0 0
2020 6.8 2.7 5 0 0
2019 8.7 7.5 7 0 0
2018 4.5 4.5 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238110 · NE · Omaha

1,314 Footing and foundation concrete contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,594 rated employers in Nebraska with headcount on file · 1,135 employers in Omaha, NE · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SAK Builders 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Precision Concrete LLC 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR RME CONCRETE PUMPERS, INC. 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Modern Industries dba Modern Concrete 5.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE 101780 - Nebraska Comprehensive Cancer Center 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wolfe Electric Co., Inc. 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE METL-FAB, INC. 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jayhawk Boxes Inc 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR Drivers Management LLC/Over the Road Drivers 9,373 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nebraska Medicine 8,728 FTE
CITY-NEAR FUSION MEDICAL STAFFING, LLC 2,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR 61830001 METHODIST HOSPITAL 2,861 FTE
NAT-TCR Abbott Air Inc. 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Davison Sales Branch 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Pinnacle Premix, LLC 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Umpi Kelley Commons 5.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Harrisburg Division 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Golden Years Nursing Home, Inc. LG 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Majestic Masonry Inc. 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Core-Tech 64 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.