Folding paper and paperboard containers (except corrugated) made from purchased paperboard · Alabama

Sterling Packaging, LLC

Monroeville, AL · ~41 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sterling Packaging, LLC runs at 265% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Folding paper and paperboard containers (except corrugated) made from purchased paperboard workplace, earning a grade F.

Sterling Packaging, LLC: 8.7 TCR = 265% of Folding paper and paperboard containers (except corrugated) made from purchased paperboard BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sterling Packaging, LLC safety composite

Sterling Packaging, LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.1

2022→2024

Sterling Packaging, LLC injury rate improved

Sterling Packaging, LLC's TCR fell 6.1 from 12.3 in 2022 to 6.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 12.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=12.3 · 2023=7.7 · 2024=6.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322212 · Monroeville, AL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.7 · 265% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/8
  • PHOTO Manufacturing
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Manufacturing (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Sterling Packaging, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sterling Packaging, LLC averages 8.7 TCR (265% of the Folding paper and paperboard containers (except corrugated) made from purchased paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sterling Packaging, LLC TCR series: 2022=12.3 · 2023=7.7 · 2024=6.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Sterling Packaging, LLC falls in its industry

205 Folding paper and paperboard c establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 8 Folding paper and paperboard c employers in Alabama.

Sterling Packaging, LLC (41 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 133 employees and a TCR of 2.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sterling Packaging, LLC
Sterling Packaging, LLC (41 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 133 employees and a TCR of 2.2

Sterling Packaging, LLC has fewer employees than the Folding paper and paperboard containers median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.2 0.0 2 0 0
2023 7.7 0.0 3 0 0
2022 12.3 12.3 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322212 · AL · Monroeville

205 Folding paper and paperboard containers (except corrugated) made from purchased paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 24 employers in Monroeville, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Manufacturing 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sonderen Packaging 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Seaboard Folding Box 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Colbert Packaging Corporation - Elkhart 7.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eufaula Hatchery 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE JCG Farms of Georgia 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jasper Office - APC 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE S. A. Graham Company, Inc. 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR AL217 Alabama River Cellulose 460 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monroe County Hospital 276 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1493 233 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1493 229 FTE
NAT-TCR Belgium Butter Nut & Candy LLC 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Minkoff Company, Inc. 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Biofilm, Inc 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 8465 Raceway 8.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Carrier Commercial Services (Ashburn) 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hurley Electrical Contracting LLC 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE HVJ North Texas - Chelliah Consultants, Inc. 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Taylor Oil Northeast 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.