Applicators, wood, manufacturing · Illinois

Sterling Site Access Solutions, LLC.

Phoenix, IL · ~263 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sterling Site Access Solutions, LLC. runs at 34% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Applicators, wood, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Sterling Site Access Solutions, LLC.: 1.1 TCR = 34% of Applicators, wood, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sterling Site Access Solutions, LLC. safety composite

Sterling Site Access Solutions, LLC. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.9

2019→2024

Sterling Site Access Solutions, LLC. injury rate improved

Sterling Site Access Solutions, LLC.'s TCR fell 1.9 from 2.3 in 2019 to 0.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 2.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=2.3 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=1.7 · 2024=0.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321999 · Phoenix, IL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 34% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/11
  • PHOTO Mid-States Wood Pres…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~263 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mid-States Wood Preservers Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Sterling Site Access Solutions, LLC. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sterling Site Access Solutions, LLC. averages 1.1 TCR (34% of the Applicators, wood, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sterling Site Access Solutions, LLC. TCR series: 2019=2.3 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.7 · 2024=0.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Sterling Site Access Solutions, LLC. falls in its industry

405 Applicators, wood, manufacturi establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 11 Applicators, wood, manufacturi employers in Illinois.

Sterling Site Access Solutions, LLC. (263 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sterling Site Access Solutions, LLC.
Sterling Site Access Solutions, LLC. (263 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Sterling Site Access Solutions, LLC. has more employees than the Applicators, wood, manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.4 0.0 1 0 0
2021 1.7 1.2 3 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.3 2.3 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321999 · IL · Phoenix

405 Applicators, wood, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 6 employers in Phoenix, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mid-States Wood Preservers Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Duraflame, Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oldcastle APG - Oakhaven L&G 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR UW Solutions - Eiler Plant 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Herff Jones - Arcola 263 FTE
STATE-SIZE Winpak Portion Packaging, Inc, Sauk Village, IL 263 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fuyao Glass Illinois, Inc. 263 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oregon Tool - Oregon (IL) 263 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sterling Lumber Company, LLC. 247 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sterling Site Access Solutions - Phoenix 189 FTE
CITY-NEAR Village of Phoenix 92 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lion Lumber, LLC 30 FTE
NAT-TCR Production & Process Technologies, Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Electrolux, NPOC 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Pettus Plumbing & Piping, Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR United Chester Industries, Inc 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Keytronic R&A 263 FTE
NAT-SIZE Saint Anne's Retirement Community 263 FTE
NAT-SIZE Munson Home Care 263 FTE
NAT-SIZE San Francisco 263 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.