Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities · Minnesota

Stevens County DAC

Morris, MN · ~82 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Stevens County DAC runs at 304% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Stevens County DAC: 11.5 TCR = 304% of Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Stevens County DAC safety composite

Stevens County DAC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.6

2017→2019

Stevens County DAC injury rate improved

Stevens County DAC's TCR fell 2.6 from 8.0 in 2017 to 5.3 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 21.3 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=8.0 · 2018=21.3 · 2019=5.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Morris, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.5 · 304% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #32/44
  • PHOTO To The Rescue IA
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~82 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: To The Rescue IA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Stevens County DAC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Stevens County DAC averages 11.5 TCR (304% of the Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Stevens County DAC TCR series: 2017=8 · 2018=21.3 · 2019=5.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Stevens County DAC falls in its industry

1,320 Activity centers for disabled establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #32 safest of 44 Activity centers for disabled employers in Minnesota.

Stevens County DAC (82 employees, TCR 11.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Stevens County DAC
Stevens County DAC (82 employees, TCR 11.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Stevens County DAC has more employees than the Activity centers for disabled persons, t median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 5.3 0.0 2 0 0
2018 21.3 2.7 8 0 0
2017 8.0 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · MN · Morris

1,320 Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 38 employers in Morris, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR To The Rescue IA 11.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Manhattan Day Hab 11.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pace Winery Square 11.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Columbia Neighborhood Center 11.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Frerichs Construction 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE RRSC Minneapolis/St. Paul Market 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE CD Tile & Stone 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lofton Label, Inc 82 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Morris 392 FTE
CITY-NEAR Westmor Industries 287 FTE
CITY-NEAR Services 255 FTE
CITY-NEAR Morris Area Schools ISD #2769 223 FTE
NAT-TCR Vecellio & Grogan-Project #100-0183 11.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Delaney Ave 11.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Prodon Corp 11.5 TCR
NAT-TCR A Tool Shed Santa Clara 11.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE US IL Matteson Plant 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE WI 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Senior Care of Marlandwood West 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Senior Care of Wurzbach 82 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.