Bricks (i.e., common, face, glazed, hollow, vitrified), clay, manufacturing · Massachusetts

Stiles and Hart Brick Company

Bridgewater, MA · ~31 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Stiles and Hart Brick Company runs at 67% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Bricks (i.e., common, face, glazed, hollow, vitrified), clay, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Stiles and Hart Brick Company: 2.2 TCR = 67% of Bricks (i.e., common, face, glazed, hollow, vitrified), clay, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Stiles and Hart Brick Company safety composite

Stiles and Hart Brick Company scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Stiles and Hart Brick Company held a steady TCR band

Stiles and Hart Brick Company's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 6.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=3.0 · 2018=6.2 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=3.7 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=3.6 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327120 · Bridgewater, MA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 67% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/4
  • PHOTO 2695_5133
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 2695_5133 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Stiles and Hart Brick Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Stiles and Hart Brick Company averages 2.2 TCR (67% of the Bricks (i.e., common, face, glazed, hollow, vitrified), clay, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Stiles and Hart Brick Company TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=3 · 2018=6.2 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=3.7 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.6 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Stiles and Hart Brick Company falls in its industry

307 Bricks (i.e., common, face, gl establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 4 Bricks (i.e., common, face, gl employers in Massachusetts.

Stiles and Hart Brick Company (31 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 57 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Stiles and Hart Brick Company
Stiles and Hart Brick Company (31 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 57 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Stiles and Hart Brick Company has fewer employees than the Bricks (i.e., common, face, glazed, holl median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.6 3.6 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.7 3.7 1 0 0
2019 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2018 6.2 0.0 0 2 0
2017 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327120 · MA · Bridgewater

307 Bricks (i.e., common, face, glazed, hollow, vitrified), clay, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 35 employers in Bridgewater, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 2695_5133 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crossville Plant 2 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Certech: Wilkes-Barre, PA 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ludowici Roof Tile Co., Inc. 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE MILLBURY LEARNING CENTER-MA22 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE One Tech Circle 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Raffles Unit 28C 40 Trinity Place 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Biotech Builders Group 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bridgewater State Hospital 507 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - SMA2 463 FTE
CITY-NEAR Polar Elm St 273 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lucini Bus Lines, Inc. 256 FTE
NAT-TCR Wichita Falls, TX 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Asf 405 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR AP Mountain States, LLC 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Southwest Demolition Services 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Facility Services 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Juniper Ridge Landfill 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rowan 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Great Lakes Metal Finishing, Inc 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.