Continuing care retirement communities · Louisiana

Stiles Apartments at The Glen

Shreveport, LA · ~32 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Stiles Apartments at The Glen runs at 184% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade D.

Stiles Apartments at The Glen: 7.0 TCR = 184% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Stiles Apartments at The Glen safety composite

Stiles Apartments at The Glen scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
F 13.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Stiles Apartments at The Glen: 10.4 → 18.5 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 18.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.99× in 2024

Stiles Apartments at The Glen's TCR rose 8.1 from 10.4 in 2016 to 18.5 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.99× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Shreveport, LA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.0 · 184% of ind

  • DART 13.9 DART
  • RANK #22/36
  • PHOTO Cedarhurst Living, L…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cedarhurst Living, LLC - Topeka (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Louisiana employers → · Look up another →

Stiles Apartments at The Glen in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Stiles Apartments at The Glen averages 7.0 TCR (184% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Stiles Apartments at The Glen TCR series: 2016=10.4 · 2017=12.9 · 2018=0 · 2019=4.9 · 2020=4.6 · 2021=4.6 · 2022=0 · 2024=18.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Stiles Apartments at The Glen falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Louisiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 36 Continuing care retirement com employers in Louisiana.

Stiles Apartments at The Glen (32 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Stiles Apartments at The Glen
Stiles Apartments at The Glen (32 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Stiles Apartments at The Glen has fewer employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 18.5 13.9 4 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.6 0.0 1 0 0
2020 4.6 4.6 1 0 0
2019 4.9 4.9 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 12.9 12.9 2 0 0
2016 10.4 5.2 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · LA · Shreveport

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 6,723 rated employers in Louisiana with headcount on file · 403 employers in Shreveport, LA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cedarhurst Living, LLC - Topeka 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Senior Living, Inc. 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Riverview Landing 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crescent Wood 7.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE CORE Boiler & Mechanical Services 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Measurement Technologies, Inc. 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Entergy - Lake Charles Power Station 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Entergy - J. Wayne Leonard Power Station 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR Willis-Knighton Medical Center 3,163 FTE
CITY-NEAR UNIVERSITY HEALTH SHEREVPORT, LLC d/b/a OCHSNER LSU HEALTH SHREVEPORT 2,771 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health Shreveport 2,424 FTE
CITY-NEAR Willis-Knighton Pierremont Health Center 1,567 FTE
NAT-TCR Sycamore Specialized Carriers Inc. 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR KPMG Lakehouse 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 55802 Antioch 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Rocky Mountain Plumbing Hydroheat Inc 7.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Winston-Salem 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hilton Garden Inn Schaumburg 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE BlueEarth Marine LLC 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1652 Swn12 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.