Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) · Missouri

STL

St. Louis, MO · ~47 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

STL runs at 25% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) workplace, earning a grade A.

STL: 1.1 TCR = 25% of Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

STL safety composite

STL scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2016→2024

STL injury rate improved

STL's TCR fell 0.7 from 0.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 9.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.7 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=9.3 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488190 · St. Louis, MO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 25% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/15
  • PHOTO Avtask
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Avtask (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

STL in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows STL averages 1.1 TCR (25% of the Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

STL TCR series: 2016=0.7 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=9.3 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where STL falls in its industry

992 Aircraft maintenance and repai establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 15 Aircraft maintenance and repai employers in Missouri.

STL (47 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate STL
STL (47 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2

STL has fewer employees than the Aircraft maintenance and repair services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 9.3 4.7 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.7 0.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488190 · MO · St. Louis

992 Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 686 employers in St. Louis, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Avtask 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR SFS St. Louis-222STL 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR JBT AeroTech Corporation Airport Services SLATEC 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR GA-GM1 Moody 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE C3 Industries, Inc - Macklind 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE M & A Electric Power Cooperative 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ozark Electric Cooperative- Mount Vernon Office 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Warrensburg Service Center 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monsanto - St. Louis 6,028 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Anthony's Medical Center 3,706 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABI Corporation 2,720 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Louis University Hospital 2,084 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Claflin University 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Rolls-Royce High Temperature Composites, Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR WJW Upstate NY 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR CS Wholesale Grocers : Brattleboro, VT (GDC) 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Slinger 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE GreenWood, Inc. - Caterpiller 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gig Harbor 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Allterrain Paving & Construction LLC 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.