Employer · California

Stockton RTS

Stockton, CA · ~53 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Stockton RTS runs at 35% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical industry workplace, earning a grade A.

Stockton RTS: 1.1 TCR = 35% of industry BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Stockton RTS safety composite

Stockton RTS scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Stockton RTS held a steady TCR band

Stockton RTS's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.4 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=3.4 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322299 · Stockton, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 35% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/20
  • PHOTO Multi-Wall Packaging
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~53 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Multi-Wall Packaging (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Stockton RTS in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Stockton RTS averages 1.1 TCR (35% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Stockton RTS TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=3.4 · 2018=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Stockton RTS falls in its industry

236 industry establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 20 industry employers in California.

Stockton RTS (53 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Stockton RTS
Stockton RTS (53 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Stockton RTS has fewer employees than the industry median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.4 3.4 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322299 · CA · Stockton

236 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 605 employers in Stockton, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Multi-Wall Packaging 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hexcel Casa Grande 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Idea Inc 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Huhtamaki Marion 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE P-R Farms 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE LRC LABOR SERVICES INC 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Acemi Nursery 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ball Tagawa Growers 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR LaSalette Care and Rehabilitation Center 5,249 FTE
CITY-NEAR SCKCX0ABX SCK - ABX 4,573 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-18 4,525 FTE
CITY-NEAR CDCR CA Health Care Facility 3,227 FTE
NAT-TCR Verona 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR CS Wholesale Grocers : Newington, CT (DC) 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR LVCCLD 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Louisville Manufacturing Facility 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Alliance Health Midwest 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE JX Peterbilt - Bolingbrook/Hino Chicago 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE MA.ANDOV.3 - Ricoh Usa, Inc. 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE NA-US-CT-Milford-Cascade Boulevard 53 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.