Scaffolding rental or leasing · Florida

Stone Mountain Access Systems Inc. - Pensacola

Pensacola, FL · ~33 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.7
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Stone Mountain Access Systems Inc. - Pensacola runs at 838% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Scaffolding rental or leasing workplace, earning a grade F.

Stone Mountain Access Systems Inc. - Pensacola: 11.7 TCR = 838% of Scaffolding rental or leasing BLS 1.4 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Stone Mountain Access Systems Inc. - Pensacola safety composite

Stone Mountain Access Systems Inc. - Pensacola scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Stone Mountain Access Systems Inc. - Pensacola: 7.2 → 16.3 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 16.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.35× in 2024

Stone Mountain Access Systems Inc. - Pensacola's TCR rose 9.0 from 7.2 in 2023 to 16.3 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 532490 · Pensacola, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.7 · 838% of ind

  • DART 4.1 DART
  • RANK #7/7
  • PHOTO Universal Scaffold S…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Universal Scaffold Systems Inc (0.3 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Stone Mountain Access Systems Inc. - Pensacola in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Stone Mountain Access Systems Inc. - Pensacola averages 11.7 TCR (838% of the Scaffolding rental or leasing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Stone Mountain Access Systems Inc. - Pensacola TCR series: 2023=7.2 · 2024=16.3 · BLS 1.4

Where Stone Mountain Access Systems Inc. - Pensacola falls in its industry

120 Scaffolding rental or leasing establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 7 Scaffolding rental or leasing employers in Florida.

Stone Mountain Access Systems Inc. - Pensacola (33 employees, TCR 11.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Stone Mountain Access Systems Inc. - Pensacola
Stone Mountain Access Systems Inc. - Pensacola (33 employees, TCR 11.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Stone Mountain Access Systems Inc. - Pensacola has fewer employees than the Scaffolding rental or leasing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 16.3 4.1 4 0 0
2023 7.2 3.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

532490 · FL · Pensacola

120 Scaffolding rental or leasing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 448 employers in Pensacola, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Universal Scaffold Systems Inc 11.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hubbell Electric Heater Co 11.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Acadia Management - PA 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Acadia Management- TN 10.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Yee Farms Inc. 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE OZBLU USA LLC 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE POK-Okeechobee Clean Energy Center 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plant City Office 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lakeview Center 2,820 FTE
CITY-NEAR FLPEN36 ASCENSION SACRED HEART PENSACOLA HOSP 2,641 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-FLPEN36 2,578 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pensacola Christian College, Inc. 2,259 FTE
NAT-TCR 247 Webster 11.7 TCR
NAT-TCR TWO MEN AND A TRUCK Crystal Lake 11.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Turf Tamers 11.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Americase LLC 11.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wsm Construction Inc 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chesapeake Spice Co NV 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE USA San Antonio 9559 Airport Blvd 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crawford Mechanical Services, Inc. 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.