Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) · Texas

Stone Oak Care Center

San Antonio, TX · ~100 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.4
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Stone Oak Care Center runs at 129% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) workplace, earning a grade D.

Stone Oak Care Center: 8.4 TCR = 129% of Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS 6.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Stone Oak Care Center safety composite

Stone Oak Care Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Stone Oak Care Center: 2.6 → 4.8 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 28.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.19× in 2024

Stone Oak Care Center's TCR rose 2.2 from 2.6 in 2017 to 4.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 28.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.19× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · San Antonio, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 8.4 · 129% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #892/1034
  • PHOTO The Meadows of Kalida
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~100 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Meadows of Kalida (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Stone Oak Care Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Stone Oak Care Center averages 8.4 TCR (129% of the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Stone Oak Care Center TCR series: 2017=2.6 · 2018=8.7 · 2019=8.8 · 2020=28.4 · 2021=5.5 · 2022=3.4 · 2023=4.8 · 2024=4.8 · BLS 6.5

Where Stone Oak Care Center falls in its industry

15,252 Convalescent homes or convales establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #892 safest of 1034 Convalescent homes or convales employers in Texas.

Stone Oak Care Center (100 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Stone Oak Care Center
Stone Oak Care Center (100 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Stone Oak Care Center has fewer employees than the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.8 1.6 3 0 0
2023 4.8 3.2 3 0 0
2022 3.4 1.7 2 0 0
2021 5.5 0.0 3 0 0
2020 28.4 24.4 3 18 0
2019 8.8 1.1 8 0 0
2018 8.7 5.2 5 0 0
2017 2.6 2.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · TX · San Antonio

15,252 Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,207 employers in San Antonio, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Meadows of Kalida 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Autumn Woods Health Campus 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR PruittHealth of Moncks Corner 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR ALARIS HEALTH AT THE CHATEAU 8.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Revol Greens - TX 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dakota Utility Contractors LLC 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE McClung Energy Services, LLC 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE HCI03-FPC 100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bexar County Hospital District 8,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legend Oaks Health & Rehabilitation West San Antonio 6,953 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISS Facility Services Inc. 6,177 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buena Vida of San Antonio 5,262 FTE
NAT-TCR Cholla Livestock 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR (HFC) - TriStar Beverage, LLC - Cookeville 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR The Meadows of Kalida 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Autumn Woods Health Campus 8.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Harvard Maintenance Inc of Arizona 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Howard Concrete Pumping Company 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE AVI, Inc. 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fisher Auto Parts - OHWHSE 100 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.