Cut Stone and Stone Product Manufacturing · Georgia

Stone Systems of Atlanta

Atlanta, GA · ~28 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Stone Systems of Atlanta runs at 87% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Cut Stone and Stone Product Manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Stone Systems of Atlanta: 2.9 TCR = 87% of Cut Stone and Stone Product Manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Stone Systems of Atlanta safety composite

Stone Systems of Atlanta scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.4

2016→2024

Stone Systems of Atlanta injury rate improved

Stone Systems of Atlanta's TCR fell 3.4 from 3.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 6.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.4 · 2017=6.8 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=6.2 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=3.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327991 · Atlanta, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.9 · 87% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/26
  • PHOTO Distinctive Marble &…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Distinctive Marble & Granite (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Stone Systems of Atlanta in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Stone Systems of Atlanta averages 2.9 TCR (87% of the Cut Stone and Stone Product Manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Stone Systems of Atlanta TCR series: 2016=3.4 · 2017=6.8 · 2018=0 · 2019=6.2 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=3 · 2022=0 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Stone Systems of Atlanta falls in its industry

313 Cut Stone and Stone Product Ma establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 26 Cut Stone and Stone Product Ma employers in Georgia.

Stone Systems of Atlanta (28 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 5.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Stone Systems of Atlanta
Stone Systems of Atlanta (28 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 5.3

Stone Systems of Atlanta has fewer employees than the Cut Stone and Stone Product Manufacturin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.5 0.0 0 1 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.0 0.0 1 0 0
2020 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2019 6.2 0.0 1 1 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 6.8 0.0 2 0 0
2016 3.4 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327991 · GA · Atlanta

313 Cut Stone and Stone Product Manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 1,907 employers in Atlanta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Distinctive Marble & Granite 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Goshen Springs Road 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Konkus Marble and Granite 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Atlantic Contracting Services, LLC 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Unlimited Contract Services Blackshear AEP 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Unlimited Contract Services - Waelder, TX 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hatchery 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Georgia Forest Products, Inc 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR Insight Global 20,586 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL Airport 19,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL- Airport 18,018 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northside 13,761 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Harper Center Resident Dining 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Unlimited Care, Inc. Queens, NY 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Allina United Hospital Food 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR MRC Global -050 North Brunswick, NJ 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Colecraft Commercial Furnishings 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE FIBA Technologies - Louisville KY 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at United Club Las Per Pax 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Loyola University Starbucks 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.