Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Illinois

Stonecroft Village Retirement Community

Mendota, IL · ~27 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Stonecroft Village Retirement Community runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Stonecroft Village Retirement Community: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Stonecroft Village Retirement Community safety composite

Stonecroft Village Retirement Community scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

83/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Stonecroft Village Retirement Community held a steady TCR band

Stonecroft Village Retirement Community's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.0 TCR.

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Mendota, IL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/265
  • PHOTO PHS - GracePointe Cr…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PHS - GracePointe Crossing Commons (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Stonecroft Village Retirement Community in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Stonecroft Village Retirement Community averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Stonecroft Village Retirement Community TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Stonecroft Village Retirement Community falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 265 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Illinois.

Stonecroft Village Retirement Community (27 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Stonecroft Village Retirement Community
Stonecroft Village Retirement Community (27 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Stonecroft Village Retirement Community has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · IL · Mendota

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 29 employers in Mendota, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PHS - GracePointe Crossing Commons 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Antebellum James Burgess 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Senior Living 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Briarwood Manor Inc. 0.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE gilster mary lee corrugated plant 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Garden Place Senior Living 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Public Works Department 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Runnings of Gibson City 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR Del Monte Foods Inc. Plant #112 262 FTE
CITY-NEAR HCC Inc 160 FTE
CITY-NEAR OSF Saint Paul Medical Center 157 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Paul Medical Center 148 FTE
NAT-TCR GeoCare, Inc. DBA Home Instead Senior Care 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Portsmouth NNSY Commissary 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Columbus Health and Rehab 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR TX-01 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Expidoor Systems Inc 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stone Mountain, Georgia Container Graphics Corporation 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oh Neo140 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Save-A-Lot #24615 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.