Fence installation (except electronic containment fencing for pets) · Michigan

Straight Line Fence

Grand Rapids, MI · ~31 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Straight Line Fence runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Fence installation (except electronic containment fencing for pets) workplace, earning a grade C.

Straight Line Fence: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Fence installation (except electronic containment fencing for pets) BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Straight Line Fence safety composite

Straight Line Fence scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Straight Line Fence held a steady TCR band

Straight Line Fence's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 0.0 TCR.

2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238990 · Grand Rapids, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/30
  • PHOTO Apache - Sasol Chemi…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Apache - Sasol Chemicals Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Straight Line Fence in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Straight Line Fence averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Fence installation (except electronic containment fencing for pets) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Straight Line Fence TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Straight Line Fence falls in its industry

1,634 Fence installation (except ele establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 30 Fence installation (except ele employers in Michigan.

Straight Line Fence (31 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Straight Line Fence
Straight Line Fence (31 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Straight Line Fence has fewer employees than the Fence installation (except electronic co median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238990 · MI · Grand Rapids

1,634 Fence installation (except electronic containment fencing for pets) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 1,006 employers in Grand Rapids, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Apache - Sasol Chemicals Plant 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Apache - Kiewit Offshore Services 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Core Scaffold Systems Inc. 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR BrandSafway, LLC - Houston - Laporte Branch 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Schwartz Greenhouse, Inc. 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Electric Production 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE R.B. Satkowiak's City Sewer Cleaners 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Melching Inc. 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR SHHG-GR BUTTERWORTH CA 9,012 FTE
CITY-NEAR SH Butterworth Hospital 7,397 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Saint Mary's Hospital-MH-MI 2,914 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steelcase - Grand Rapids / Kentwood 2,817 FTE
NAT-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 432 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 426 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 240 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 231 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wedemeyer Bakery 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE All Metals - Cartersville, GA, loc'n #1098 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE KenMac Metals - Richburg 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Square Deal Recordings & Supplies, Inc. 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.