Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building · Texas

Structura

Austin, TX · ~99 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Structura runs at 25% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade A.

Structura: 0.7 TCR = 25% of Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Structura safety composite

Structura scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2018→2024

Structura injury rate improved

Structura's TCR fell 1.0 from 1.9 in 2018 to 0.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.19× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=1.9 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Austin, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 25% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #91/327
  • PHOTO MEJA Construction, I…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~99 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MEJA Construction, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Structura in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Structura averages 0.7 TCR (25% of the Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Structura TCR series: 2018=1.9 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=0.9 · BLS 2.9

Where Structura falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #91 safest of 327 Addition, alteration and renov employers in Texas.

Structura (99 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Structura
Structura (99 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Structura has more employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation for- median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2023 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.9 1.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · TX · Austin

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,645 employers in Austin, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MEJA Construction, Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Timberlake Construction Co. Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR MGM Resorts International Design and Development 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR TCCo-FL 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE TXMCF 99 FTE
STATE-SIZE Andrews Brigade Energy Services 99 FTE
STATE-SIZE Enphase Energy Austin TX 99 FTE
STATE-SIZE JLB Partners, LP 99 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ensign Services 11,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-TX-Austin-Giga Texas 8,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - US Austin 6,911 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - AST 5,272 FTE
NAT-TCR DelSignore Electrical Contractors, Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Finkl Steel Composite 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Caldwell Electrical Contractors, Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR R.E. Heidt Construction 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Westview Middle School 99 FTE
NAT-SIZE Orbitform 99 FTE
NAT-SIZE Berkeley Elementary School 99 FTE
NAT-SIZE DCSS Visalia 99 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.