Concrete repair · Texas

Structural Technologies #54

Fort Worth, TX · ~111 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Structural Technologies #54 runs at 40% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Concrete repair workplace, earning a grade A.

Structural Technologies #54: 1.1 TCR = 40% of Concrete repair BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Structural Technologies #54 safety composite

Structural Technologies #54 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2016→2024

Structural Technologies #54 injury rate improved

Structural Technologies #54's TCR fell 1.7 from 2.8 in 2016 to 1.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.8 · 2017=0.9 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=1.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238110 · Fort Worth, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 40% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #37/125
  • PHOTO Wayne Brothers Inc.
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~111 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Wayne Brothers Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Structural Technologies #54 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Structural Technologies #54 averages 1.1 TCR (40% of the Concrete repair BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Structural Technologies #54 TCR series: 2016=2.8 · 2017=0.9 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=1.2 · BLS 2.8

Where Structural Technologies #54 falls in its industry

1,314 Concrete repair establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #37 safest of 125 Concrete repair employers in Texas.

Structural Technologies #54 (111 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Structural Technologies #54
Structural Technologies #54 (111 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Structural Technologies #54 has more employees than the Concrete repair median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.2 0.0 1 0 0
2023 1.9 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.6 0.0 2 0 0
2018 1.6 0.8 2 0 0
2017 0.9 0.0 1 0 0
2016 2.8 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238110 · TX · Fort Worth

1,314 Concrete repair employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,346 employers in Fort Worth, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Wayne Brothers Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Benton Concrete of North Carolina LLC 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR JKL Construction, Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Scurto Cement Construction, Ltd. 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Supreme Production Services Inc. 111 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sapphire Gas Solutions, LLC - Main Office 111 FTE
STATE-SIZE Turbine Maintenance Group 111 FTE
STATE-SIZE BBLbc, LLC 111 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US TX Fort Worth Lockheed Blvd (1093) 16,547 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Fort Worth Campus (1093) 13,805 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cook Children's Medical Center 4,998 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX- Fort Worth 4,667 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Mclean Hospital 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Lausanne Collegiate School 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Feeley, McAnespie, Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Lilesville 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Storer Equipment 111 FTE
NAT-SIZE Green Ridge Care Center 111 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Music Theatre 111 FTE
NAT-SIZE PFT-TULSA 111 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.