Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing · Oregon

Stryker Construction, Inc.

Gladstone, OR · ~22 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Stryker Construction, Inc. runs at 311% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Stryker Construction, Inc.: 10.3 TCR = 311% of Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Stryker Construction, Inc. safety composite

Stryker Construction, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
F 21.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Stryker Construction, Inc.: 0.0 → 21.4 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 23.4 TCR · DART/TCR 2.09× in 2023

Stryker Construction, Inc.'s TCR rose 21.4 from 0.0 in 2018 to 21.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 23.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 2.09× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332322 · Gladstone, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.3 · 311% of ind

  • DART 21.4 DART
  • RANK #16/16
  • PHOTO TDR Systems, Inc. t/…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TDR Systems, Inc. t/a CHUTES International (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Stryker Construction, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Stryker Construction, Inc. averages 10.3 TCR (311% of the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Stryker Construction, Inc. TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0.1 · 2020=9.4 · 2021=7.2 · 2022=23.4 · 2023=21.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Stryker Construction, Inc. falls in its industry

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stamp establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 16 Sheet metal work (except stamp employers in Oregon.

Stryker Construction, Inc. (22 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Stryker Construction, Inc.
Stryker Construction, Inc. (22 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Stryker Construction, Inc. has fewer employees than the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 21.4 21.4 3 1 0
2022 23.4 15.6 3 0 0
2021 7.2 7.2 1 0 0
2020 9.4 9.4 1 1 0
2019 0.1 0.1 1 1 0
2018 0.0 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332322 · OR · Gladstone

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 11 employers in Gladstone, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TDR Systems, Inc. t/a CHUTES International 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Clark Metal Products Company 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Legacy Metal Headquarters 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southeastern Metal Products LLC 10.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hammelmans Floral, LLC 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Means Nursery Inc (River Road) 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE HASTINGS BULB GROWERS, INC 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ekstrom & Schmidt Nursery, LLC 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR SWY-0019-0019-04387 FAC-04387-GLADSTONE-OR 86 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6400-SWY-0019-0019-04387 84 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6400-SWY 0019 4387 67 FTE
CITY-NEAR Avamere Rehabilitation of Clackamas 62 FTE
NAT-TCR LMA Professional Orthopedics 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Clinton Plant 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Covetrus-Elizabethtown 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Lodge at Cold Spring 10.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ernest-Spencer Custom Coatings 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE MCR Champaign 3 Tenant LLC 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Norfolk w/JV 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quincy Office Liquid Plant & Chemical 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.