Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) · Michigan

Stryker

Portage, MI · ~212 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Stryker runs at 153% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) workplace, earning a grade D.

Stryker: 4.6 TCR = 153% of Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) BLS 3.0 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Stryker safety composite

Stryker scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Stryker: 0.7 → 2.5 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 15.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.54× in 2024

Stryker's TCR rose 1.7 from 0.7 in 2016 to 2.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 15.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.54× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · Portage, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.6 · 153% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #134/210
  • PHOTO OK City Res Dining
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~212 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: OK City Res Dining (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Stryker in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Stryker averages 4.6 TCR (153% of the Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Stryker TCR series: 2016=0.7 · 2017=0.8 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=0 · 2020=15.5 · 2021=7.8 · 2022=0.1 · 2023=12.6 · 2024=2.5 · BLS 3.0

Where Stryker falls in its industry

6,952 Cafeteria food services contra establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #134 safest of 210 Cafeteria food services contra employers in Michigan.

Stryker (212 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Stryker
Stryker (212 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Stryker has more employees than the Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2023 12.6 10.5 5 1 0
2022 0.1 0.0 1 0 0
2021 7.8 7.8 2 0 0
2020 15.5 7.8 4 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.3 0.6 2 0 0
2017 0.8 0.8 2 0 0
2016 0.7 0.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · MI · Portage

6,952 Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 136 employers in Portage, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR OK City Res Dining 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT COOS BAY SCHOOL DISTRICT 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR UNF CLUB HOUSE 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT DAYTONA STATE COLLEGE 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Progressive Mechanical, Inc 212 FTE
STATE-SIZE Total Fire Protection, Inc. 212 FTE
STATE-SIZE FloraCraft Corporation Headquarters 212 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mold Masters Company 212 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stryker Instruments - 1941 2,914 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stryker Medical 2,059 FTE
CITY-NEAR Summit Polymers, Inc. 1,619 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stryker Corporation Shared Services 768 FTE
NAT-TCR The Fresh Market 124 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR New Horizons Marlborough 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Kankakee Valley Construction Company 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Brownsville Save A Lot 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE CK Contractors & Development North Carolina 212 FTE
NAT-SIZE Siteworks LLC Office 212 FTE
NAT-SIZE San Antonio Machine Shop 212 FTE
NAT-SIZE Western Harvesting 212 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.